PolymarketPlease All take a minute to read this
Please All take a minute to read this
ydak参与话题 3消息总数 296
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 296 条，显示第 251-296 条THAT THEY WERE INCLUDED NOO !!!
THAT THEY WERE INCLUDED NOO !!!
EVERY MAJOR OUTLET TALKED ABOUT IT
EVERY MAJOR OUTLET TALKED ABOUT IT
there couldn't be more meaning to the word CONSENSUS
there couldn't be more meaning to the word CONSENSUS
That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
FOR THE AGREEMENT TO EXIST YOU DONT !!
FOR THE AGREEMENT TO EXIST YOU DONT !!
The inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a qualifying peace deal between multiple parties will qualify.
The inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a qualifying peace deal between multiple parties will qualify.
YOU DONT !! YOU NEED ISRAEL and hezbollah be in included Just read
YOU DONT !! YOU NEED ISRAEL and hezbollah be in included Just read
NO BRO NO PLEASE READ THE RULES
NO BRO NO PLEASE READ THE RULES
The market rules state two things: 1. “The inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a qualifying peace deal between multiple parties will qualify.” 2. “A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.” * Pakistan, the lead mediator, announced that the agreement provides for the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” * Reuters further reported that the immediate and permanent end of military operations includes Lebanon, and that Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said operations would stop permanently, including in Lebanon. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/what-us-iran-say-they-have-agreed-memorandum-end-war-2026-06-15/ * Associated Press reported that both sides declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-war-oil-june-15-2026-77406473da38c6c126818610a219dc20 * Washington Post reported that both sides declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/06/14/trump-says-us-iran-very-close-deal-urges-calm-after-israeli-strikes/ * New York Times reported that the agreement calls for “an immediate end to military operations on all fronts. That includes Lebanon, where Israel and the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah are fighting.” https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/06/15/world/iran-war-trump-us-deal * The Lebanese Presidency officially welcomed the memorandum and stated that it includes a halt to military actions and escalation in the region, including Lebanon. https://x.com/lbpresidency/status/2066451651699855365?s=46 * Trump also shared an article on Truth Social describing the agreement as including an immediate and permanent end to military operations, including those in Lebanon. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116753971776687226
The market rules state two things: 1. “The inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a qualifying peace deal between multiple parties will qualify.” 2. “A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.” * Pakistan, the lead mediator, announced that the agreement provides for the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” * Reuters further reported that the immediate and permanent end of military operations includes Lebanon, and that Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said operations would stop permanently, including in Lebanon. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/what-us-iran-say-they-have-agreed-memorandum-end-war-2026-06-15/ * Associated Press reported that both sides declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-war-oil-june-15-2026-77406473da38c6c126818610a219dc20 * Washington Post reported that both sides declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/06/14/trump-says-us-iran-very-close-deal-urges-calm-after-israeli-strikes/ * New York Times reported that the agreement calls for “an immediate end to military operations on all fronts. That includes Lebanon, where Israel and the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah are fighting.” https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/06/15/world/iran-war-trump-us-deal * The Lebanese Presidency officially welcomed the memorandum and stated that it includes a halt to military actions and escalation in the region, including Lebanon. https://x.com/lbpresidency/status/2066451651699855365?s=46 * Trump also shared an article on Truth Social describing the agreement as including an immediate and permanent end to military operations, including those in Lebanon. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116753971776687226
please someone post this in the dispute thread of hezbollah x israel im not able idk why
please someone post this in the dispute thread of hezbollah x israel im not able idk why
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
pls <@886004822669664286> aexplain this The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used.
pls <@886004822669664286> aexplain this The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used.
bro what is the meaning of this The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used.
bro what is the meaning of this The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used.
THE INCLUSION OF ISRAEL AND HEZBOLLAH , NOT THE AGREEMENT
THE INCLUSION OF ISRAEL AND HEZBOLLAH , NOT THE AGREEMENT
The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used. That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used. That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
NOOOO THE RULES DO NOT
NOOOO THE RULES DO NOT
For israel x hezbollah deal
For israel x hezbollah deal
take a look ! https://x.com/lbpresidency/status/2066451651699855365?s=46 LEBANON PRESIDENT CONFIRMED
take a look ! https://x.com/lbpresidency/status/2066451651699855365?s=46 LEBANON PRESIDENT CONFIRMED
And now lebanon president did it also !!
And now lebanon president did it also !!
and a deal happened and was reported by That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
and a deal happened and was reported by That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
The rules do not requires that israel agree but that a deal happen
The rules do not requires that israel agree but that a deal happen
hezbollah never agreed to the other deals bruh what are you talking about
hezbollah never agreed to the other deals bruh what are you talking about
lets propose yes for june 30 and july 31 like the iran x us peace deal
lets propose yes for june 30 and july 31 like the iran x us peace deal
AND YET IT GOT YES
AND YET IT GOT YES
in precious ceasefire , HEZBOLLAH WAS NEVER THE ONE TALKING
in precious ceasefire , HEZBOLLAH WAS NEVER THE ONE TALKING
Yes Hezbollah x Israel peace deal
Yes Hezbollah x Israel peace deal
someone propose for June 30 and july 31 man
someone propose for June 30 and july 31 man
why no one proposed YES for june 15, 30 and july 31 Hezbollah x israel peace ?? The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used. That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
why no one proposed YES for june 15, 30 and july 31 Hezbollah x israel peace ?? The rules explicitly say that the inclusion of Israel and Hezbollah in a broader multi-party peace deal qualifies, and that a consensus of credible reporting may be used. That consensus now includes Reuters, AP, NYT, Washington Post, the Lebanese Presidency, Pakistan (the lead mediator), Iran, and Hezbollah itself—all describing the agreement as including Lebanon.
But this goes into YES ! because the agreement happened and israel is in it !
But this goes into YES ! because the agreement happened and israel is in it !
if im wrong tell me please
if im wrong tell me please
hezbollah x israel permanent peace just look it up guys
hezbollah x israel permanent peace just look it up guys
look at Dofu0715 whom dumped 200k no , he SAID IN THE COMMENTS THAT HE BELIEVES LEBANON IS NOT HEZBOLLAH
look at Dofu0715 whom dumped 200k no , he SAID IN THE COMMENTS THAT HE BELIEVES LEBANON IS NOT HEZBOLLAH
it's really crazy check it yourselfs man all p1 yes in the reports there is Permanent end on all front including lebanon
it's really crazy check it yourselfs man all p1 yes in the reports there is Permanent end on all front including lebanon
AND ALSO THE IRAN X US PEACE DEAL EVERY YES ARGUMENT FALLS INTO LEBANON
AND ALSO THE IRAN X US PEACE DEAL EVERY YES ARGUMENT FALLS INTO LEBANON
All and i mean all major news outlet reported that
All and i mean all major news outlet reported that
Is said however consensus of credible report
Is said however consensus of credible report
but there's no one betting against him
but there's no one betting against him
bro this man lost 100 band on other market
bro this man lost 100 band on other market
how could 2 person manipulate the whole market with 350k ?
how could 2 person manipulate the whole market with 350k ?
Hezbollah x israel Permanent peace deal market was already at 40¢ before two large NO holders dumped roughly $350,000 worth of shares. Think about what has actually happened since then: * Hezbollah announced it. * Pakistan — the lead mediator — announced it. * Iran’s Supreme National Security Council announced it. * Iran’s Foreign Minister announced it. * Reuters, AP, New York Times, and Washington Post all reported that the agreement includes Lebanon. * Trump even reposted an article on Truth Social saying the agreement includes Lebanon. * Israeli officials aren’t saying “there is no Lebanon clause.” They’re arguing they won’t withdraw or won’t be bound by it. The evidence got stronger. The price got lower.
Hezbollah x israel Permanent peace deal market was already at 40¢ before two large NO holders dumped roughly $350,000 worth of shares. Think about what has actually happened since then: * Hezbollah announced it. * Pakistan — the lead mediator — announced it. * Iran’s Supreme National Security Council announced it. * Iran’s Foreign Minister announced it. * Reuters, AP, New York Times, and Washington Post all reported that the agreement includes Lebanon. * Trump even reposted an article on Truth Social saying the agreement includes Lebanon. * Israeli officials aren’t saying “there is no Lebanon clause.” They’re arguing they won’t withdraw or won’t be bound by it. The evidence got stronger. The price got lower.
Hezbollah announced it. ● Pakistan — the lead mediator — announced it. ● Iran’s Supreme National Security Council announced it. ● Iran’s Foreign Minister announced it. ● Reuters, AP, New York Times, and Washington Post all reported that the agreement includes Lebanon. ● Trump even reposted an article on Truth Social saying the agreement includes Lebanon. ● Israeli officials aren’t saying “there is no Lebanon clause.” They’re arguing they won’t withdraw or won’t be bound by it.
Hezbollah announced it. ● Pakistan — the lead mediator — announced it. ● Iran’s Supreme National Security Council announced it. ● Iran’s Foreign Minister announced it. ● Reuters, AP, New York Times, and Washington Post all reported that the agreement includes Lebanon. ● Trump even reposted an article on Truth Social saying the agreement includes Lebanon. ● Israeli officials aren’t saying “there is no Lebanon clause.” They’re arguing they won’t withdraw or won’t be bound by it.
The Israel–Hezbollah peace deal market is sitting around 2¢ today because two large NO holders dumped roughly $350,000 after the market had already reached 40¢. Meanwhile, go read the U.S.–Iran peace deal Discord. The entire 95%+ YES case is built around the agreement announced by Pakistan and reported by Reuters, AP, NYT, and Washington Post. And what does that agreement explicitly say? It includes Lebanon. So the same people arguing for a 95% U.S.–Iran YES are relying on a framework that explicitly covers Lebanon, while the Israel–Hezbollah market trades at 2¢ because a couple of whales bought into a thin order book. The information didn’t disappear. The liquidity did.
The Israel–Hezbollah peace deal market is sitting around 2¢ today because two large NO holders dumped roughly $350,000 after the market had already reached 40¢. Meanwhile, go read the U.S.–Iran peace deal Discord. The entire 95%+ YES case is built around the agreement announced by Pakistan and reported by Reuters, AP, NYT, and Washington Post. And what does that agreement explicitly say? It includes Lebanon. So the same people arguing for a 95% U.S.–Iran YES are relying on a framework that explicitly covers Lebanon, while the Israel–Hezbollah market trades at 2¢ because a couple of whales bought into a thin order book. The information didn’t disappear. The liquidity did.
will there ever be a clarification ?
will there ever be a clarification ?
its truly weird how the hezbollah x israel peace deal is just like the Us x iran how did Dofu and Lorry Manipulate it to No
its truly weird how the hezbollah x israel peace deal is just like the Us x iran how did Dofu and Lorry Manipulate it to No
Every single and all arguments that are existing for Yes on Iran x Us Peacedeal says include Lebanon this is so weird
Every single and all arguments that are existing for Yes on Iran x Us Peacedeal says include Lebanon this is so weird
← 上一页
第 6 / 6 页