该用户的聊天记录定位。
https://polymarket.com/event/iran-announces-withdrawal-from-mou-negotiations-byptptpt-20260622191732319/will-iran-announce-withdrawal-from-mou-negotiations-by-august-15. Sept and December markets please
https://polymarket.com/event/iran-announces-withdrawal-from-mou-negotiations-byptptpt-20260622191732319/will-iran-announce-withdrawal-from-mou-negotiations-by-august-15. Sept and December markets please
September and December dates please : https://polymarket.com/event/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-in-2025/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-by-june-30
September and December dates please : https://polymarket.com/event/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-in-2025/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-by-june-30
https://polymarket.com/event/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-in-2025/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-by-june-30
https://polymarket.com/event/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-in-2025/ukraine-officially-agrees-to-a-us-backed-ceasefire-framework-by-june-30
Enrichment scam is dead
Enrichment scam is dead
You made your own table?
You made your own table?
No, the price for yes has not tanked since you, scottyno and denniz have bought as many shares as the remaining top 20 yes holders accumulated. Some here follow the bandwagon since you have a good track record of scamming, also scaring away some previous no holders. But remove you guys 3 the price would be in X cents. That is not alpha, you are obviously trying to misresolve.
No, the price for yes has not tanked since you, scottyno and denniz have bought as many shares as the remaining top 20 yes holders accumulated. Some here follow the bandwagon since you have a good track record of scamming, also scaring away some previous no holders. But remove you guys 3 the price would be in X cents. That is not alpha, you are obviously trying to misresolve.
It will be disputed
It will be disputed
Enrichment scam still ongoing?
Enrichment scam still ongoing?
Exactly! You are arguing no side here. It is worded in a way which does not give away their right to enrich. If they physically can or cannot is irrelevant. You need "An official pledge by Iran to end all enrichment of Uranium will qualify for a “Yes” resolution"
Exactly! You are arguing no side here. It is worded in a way which does not give away their right to enrich. If they physically can or cannot is irrelevant. You need "An official pledge by Iran to end all enrichment of Uranium will qualify for a “Yes” resolution"
That they physically cant enrich (which may not be true) is not relevant. They still maintain the right to enrich under the status quo, and have not waived that in the MOU. Obviously, the US wanted them to give up enrichment, and it would have been part of the deal if Iran made this concession. Which they have not.
That they physically cant enrich (which may not be true) is not relevant. They still maintain the right to enrich under the status quo, and have not waived that in the MOU. Obviously, the US wanted them to give up enrichment, and it would have been part of the deal if Iran made this concession. Which they have not.
Not physically able to (assumed at the bombed locations, what else is there we dont know) and what they are allowed to / have agreed to are not the same. Status quo agreement wise is that they are allowed to keep on enriching as they have since last agreement. Obviously, if Iran had agreed to not enrich, it would be explicit in the agreement. It is not, for a reason. Even if it was rather "cheap" for them. Its one of their key bargaining chips
Not physically able to (assumed at the bombed locations, what else is there we dont know) and what they are allowed to / have agreed to are not the same. Status quo agreement wise is that they are allowed to keep on enriching as they have since last agreement. Obviously, if Iran had agreed to not enrich, it would be explicit in the agreement. It is not, for a reason. Even if it was rather "cheap" for them. Its one of their key bargaining chips
Yes. Iran has not publicly accepted “zero enrichment.”. Neither has Trump / US allowed them to. Status quo is likey referring back to the latest nuclear deal/agreementl that restricted Tehran’s nuclear program. Which would be the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, that allows Tehran uranium enrichment to 3.67%. Status quo = they are allowed to enrich. Alternatively, status quo is not sufficient to resolve either market
Yes. Iran has not publicly accepted “zero enrichment.”. Neither has Trump / US allowed them to. Status quo is likey referring back to the latest nuclear deal/agreementl that restricted Tehran’s nuclear program. Which would be the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, that allows Tehran uranium enrichment to 3.67%. Status quo = they are allowed to enrich. Alternatively, status quo is not sufficient to resolve either market
No, they dont. You need annoucments on the topic. There may not be sufficient announcements. It is not either or. So both can go to no.
No, they dont. You need annoucments on the topic. There may not be sufficient announcements. It is not either or. So both can go to no.
Polymarket