Polymarketbut that's about market closing, not the event itself
but that's about market closing, not the event itself
cambridgeisaac参与话题 3消息总数 57
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 57 条，显示第 1-50 条they said three calendar days AST
they said three calendar days AST
so is it july 9 AST? (the rules sorta imply that but don't actually say it)
so is it july 9 AST? (the rules sorta imply that but don't actually say it)
there's no location with the byline, so it's hard to know where it's filed fro--and therefore what timezone the artilce is writing in
there's no location with the byline, so it's hard to know where it's filed fro--and therefore what timezone the artilce is writing in
it's bad for Y that the opening sentence of hte artile is that iran and us exchanged fire wednesday night
it's bad for Y that the opening sentence of hte artile is that iran and us exchanged fire wednesday night
also, do we have a timeline for the wednesday night US strikes on iran?
also, do we have a timeline for the wednesday night US strikes on iran?
"The U.S. and Iran exchanged fire on Wednesday night after President Trump said he considered the ceasefire over, a second night of tit-for-tat attacks that marked the largest escalation in fighting since the two sides agreed to a 60-day peace deal last month" Does anybody know how newspapers deal with midnight in situations like this. like if they know some strikes occur after midnight, would they have said wednesday nught and thursday morning?
"The U.S. and Iran exchanged fire on Wednesday night after President Trump said he considered the ceasefire over, a second night of tit-for-tat attacks that marked the largest escalation in fighting since the two sides agreed to a 60-day peace deal last month" Does anybody know how newspapers deal with midnight in situations like this. like if they know some strikes occur after midnight, would they have said wednesday nught and thursday morning?
what do you think best evidence for july 9 strike is?
what do you think best evidence for july 9 strike is?
is that what analist quoted a big chunk from like 15 mins ago?
is that what analist quoted a big chunk from like 15 mins ago?
what is best evidence for july 9 strike?
what is best evidence for july 9 strike?
https://polymarket.com/event/which-artists-will-have-1-hits-in-the-us-in-june/will-drake-have-a-1-hit-in-the-us-in-june
https://polymarket.com/event/which-artists-will-have-1-hits-in-the-us-in-june/will-drake-have-a-1-hit-in-the-us-in-june
somebody just took it...
somebody just took it...
this is stronger than enrichment. you don't need to infer anything here
this is stronger than enrichment. you don't need to infer anything here
let's flip it!!
let's flip it!!
crazy that this is at 1c right now
crazy that this is at 1c right now
soembody wanna propose this one: https://polymarket.com/event/ebola-case-in-the-us-by-june-30
soembody wanna propose this one: https://polymarket.com/event/ebola-case-in-the-us-by-june-30
wouldn't people have sluethed out weird accounts on these markets? but yeah, it would be sorta crazy if they weren't profiting from it somehow...
wouldn't people have sluethed out weird accounts on these markets? but yeah, it would be sorta crazy if they weren't profiting from it somehow...
or upside hebrew
or upside hebrew
imagine you told somebody it maybe be written using any script in the world, they for sure would not identify the middle letter as an 'f'
imagine you told somebody it maybe be written using any script in the world, they for sure would not identify the middle letter as an 'f'
What does it say. I have no idea
What does it say. I have no idea
U and c are legible, the f for sure is not
U and c are legible, the f for sure is not
Has anybody shown it to a normal person who doesn’t know ufc logo and confirmed they can read it ?
Has anybody shown it to a normal person who doesn’t know ufc logo and confirmed they can read it ?
But obvs threshold is a bit arbitrary
But obvs threshold is a bit arbitrary
Well they should t really have to study it
Well they should t really have to study it
The test should be whether it is reasonable to expect that a person unfamiliar with the ufc logo could read it within a second or two
The test should be whether it is reasonable to expect that a person unfamiliar with the ufc logo could read it within a second or two
It’s logo recognition, not reading
It’s logo recognition, not reading
That
That
Yeah and the ‘f’ is getting pretty close to tha
Yeah and the ‘f’ is getting pretty close to tha
I there’s no distinction between stylized logo and text ?
I there’s no distinction between stylized logo and text ?
Because of the upside-ness and the stylized nature of the ‘f’ in the logo
Because of the upside-ness and the stylized nature of the ‘f’ in the logo
You can argue that he posted the ufc logo but not the word
You can argue that he posted the ufc logo but not the word
i'm sure the guy was referring to me
i'm sure the guy was referring to me
replying to a poll is like voting in real life--only the retired do it
replying to a poll is like voting in real life--only the retired do it
my assumption is that everybody is like 14
my assumption is that everybody is like 14
just curious about age distribution...
just curious about age distribution...
?
?
for real
for real
the manner in which i type is incorrect
the manner in which i type is incorrect
fast can be used as an adverb
fast can be used as an adverb
thankfully they just vote on price
thankfully they just vote on price
how do peoiple know okayaway is umarocks rep? is there a list somewhere?
how do peoiple know okayaway is umarocks rep? is there a list somewhere?
i obvs agre
i obvs agre
that confident in the clarification that you want to turn down the 95% from umarocks lol
that confident in the clarification that you want to turn down the 95% from umarocks lol
I wish this weren’t too late for bosarum
I wish this weren’t too late for bosarum
But it’s not phrased this way in the mou at all. It’s phrased as two steps that are both definitely going to happen. You’re injecting an understanding of real world dynamics into the reading of the actual agreement, are t you?
But it’s not phrased this way in the mou at all. It’s phrased as two steps that are both definitely going to happen. You’re injecting an understanding of real world dynamics into the reading of the actual agreement, are t you?
The whole issue is that we think it is unlikely that they will reach a final deal in 60 days, so it feels conditional. If we thought the final deal were for sure going to be signed in 60 days, nobody would bat an eyelash. But our intuition about the likelihood of a final deal is totally irrelevant here
The whole issue is that we think it is unlikely that they will reach a final deal in 60 days, so it feels conditional. If we thought the final deal were for sure going to be signed in 60 days, nobody would bat an eyelash. But our intuition about the likelihood of a final deal is totally irrelevant here
iran wouldn't have signed a document that said "IRAN IS GETTING OWNED BY TRUMP AND IS NOT ALLOWED TO ENRICH ANYTHING"
iran wouldn't have signed a document that said "IRAN IS GETTING OWNED BY TRUMP AND IS NOT ALLOWED TO ENRICH ANYTHING"
it's diplomatically worded so as to allow iran to save face
it's diplomatically worded so as to allow iran to save face
this is the worst no argument
this is the worst no argument
there is reporting and a statement from iran gov official, indicating iran isn't enriching at all right now
there is reporting and a statement from iran gov official, indicating iran isn't enriching at all right now
第 1 / 2 页
下一页 →