Rebel Hermits参与话题 4消息总数 65

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 22:06:47 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX因SpaceX股数增加未调仓致多头亏损10%争议

haha "11.87B " was stated in their doc, then secretly deleted

haha "11.87B " was stated in their doc, then secretly deleted

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 22:00:03 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX因SpaceX股数增加未调仓致多头亏损10%争议

* Almost no communication with their users * Initially listed 11.87B shares, then secretly deleted them * the docs says nothing whether rebase or NOT. However, even if we declare no rebase, it's still a huge failure for both TradexYZ and the users. * Still Didn't clearly explain how stock splits would be handled. No rebase = No stock splits = GG? * The only exchange that did nothing * Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notion

* Almost no communication with their users * Initially listed 11.87B shares, then secretly deleted them * the docs says nothing whether rebase or NOT. However, even if we declare no rebase, it's still a huge failure for both TradexYZ and the users. * Still Didn't clearly explain how stock splits would be handled. No rebase = No stock splits = GG? * The only exchange that did nothing * Made 90% of users with long positions lose 10% of their notion

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 21:50:23 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX因SpaceX股数增加未调仓致多头亏损10%争议

Over 90% of SPCX users were long, meaning these HyperLiquid + Trade.xyz users all suffered a 10% loss. Trade.xyz was the first exchange to list and stated 11.87B shares, but ironically, it was the only exchange that did nothing.

Over 90% of SPCX users were long, meaning these HyperLiquid + Trade.xyz users all suffered a 10% loss. Trade.xyz was the first exchange to list and stated 11.87B shares, but ironically, it was the only exchange that did nothing.

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 21:46:51 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX因SpaceX股数增加未调仓致多头亏损10%争议

trade.xyz's handling of this matter is dishonest and disappointing.

trade.xyz's handling of this matter is dishonest and disappointing.

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 17:26:26 ↗ Hyperliquid

tradexyz founder: https://x.com/sershokunin

tradexyz founder: https://x.com/sershokunin

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 15:55:22 ↗ Hyperliquid

<@1417225527978233886> I've read through <Non-Arbitrage Conditions for Perpetual Forwards> 1. For SPCX, when there was a known future price gap, it was not reflected through funding, nor were long positions compensated. That mechanism failed. In practice, this did cause a 10% loss for long positions. I opened my long position at launch based on the 11.87B shares figure. 2. The article does not explain how stock splits should be handled. How do you plan to handle stock splits? Are you also planning to compensate long positions through funding? That would be very hard to believe. Could u clarify? Thank u.

<@1417225527978233886> I've read through <Non-Arbitrage Conditions for Perpetual Forwards> 1. For SPCX, when there was a known future price gap, it was not reflected through funding, nor were long positions compensated. That mechanism failed. In practice, this did cause a 10% loss for long positions. I opened my long position at launch based on the 11.87B shares figure. 2. The article does not explain how stock splits should be handled. How do you plan to handle stock splits? Are you also planning to compensate long positions through funding? That would be very hard to believe. Could u clarify? Thank u.

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 15:42:59 ↗ Hyperliquid

This is trade.xyz guy. I think it is better to discuss trade.xyz problem here, in this open space.

This is trade.xyz guy. I think it is better to discuss trade.xyz problem here, in this open space.

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 12:51:13 ↗ Hyperliquid

For stock splits, can you confirm the exact position-adjustment mechanics? For example, if xyz:META has a 3-for-1 split, would a 100-contract long position become 300 contracts with the entry price divided by 3, preserving notional exposure?

For stock splits, can you confirm the exact position-adjustment mechanics? For example, if xyz:META has a 3-for-1 split, would a 100-contract long position become 300 contracts with the entry price divided by 3, preserving notional exposure?

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 11:14:44 ↗ Hyperliquid

Please clarify these two situations, thanks

Please clarify these two situations, thanks

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 11:12:03 ↗ Hyperliquid

1. If Meta announces tomorrow that its stock is doing a 3-for-1 split, would long positions directly lose two-thirds of their notional value? 2. If NVDA announces a special dividend of $10 per share tomorrow, would our xyz:NVDA long positions instantly lose $10 per share?

1. If Meta announces tomorrow that its stock is doing a 3-for-1 split, would long positions directly lose two-thirds of their notional value? 2. If NVDA announces a special dividend of $10 per share tomorrow, would our xyz:NVDA long positions instantly lose $10 per share?

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 10:17:51 ↗ Hyperliquid

> since it tracks per share 1. If Meta announces tomorrow that its stock is doing a 3-for-1 split, would long positions directly lose two-thirds of their notional value? 2. If NVDA announces a special dividend of $10 per share tomorrow, would our xyz:NVDA long positions instantly lose $10 per share?

> since it tracks per share 1. If Meta announces tomorrow that its stock is doing a 3-for-1 split, would long positions directly lose two-thirds of their notional value? 2. If NVDA announces a special dividend of $10 per share tomorrow, would our xyz:NVDA long positions instantly lose $10 per share?

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 10:15:40 ↗ Hyperliquid

<@1417225527978233886> sorry to tag u, but it is very important. If trade.xyz does not rebase pre-IPO stocks for share-count changes, does that mean it would also not rebase stocks for stock split?

<@1417225527978233886> sorry to tag u, but it is very important. If trade.xyz does not rebase pre-IPO stocks for share-count changes, does that mean it would also not rebase stocks for stock split?

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 10:02:43 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX 在 Hyperliquid 与 Binance 存在大幅价差，社区质疑未 rebase 导致多头损失

Just like today, Binance ruthlessly wiped out the long positions on HyperLiquid. If hyperliquid(xyz) continues to do nothing, this will happen again and again

Just like today, Binance ruthlessly wiped out the long positions on HyperLiquid. If hyperliquid(xyz) continues to do nothing, this will happen again and again

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 09:58:05 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX 在 Hyperliquid 与 Binance 存在大幅价差，社区质疑未 rebase 导致多头损失

> since it tracks per share Furthermore, if a stock undergoes a stock split, will Hyperliquid (XYZ) also do nothing? Does this mean the longs could suffer heavy losses at any time?

> since it tracks per share Furthermore, if a stock undergoes a stock split, will Hyperliquid (XYZ) also do nothing? Does this mean the longs could suffer heavy losses at any time?

Rebel Hermits 2026-06-09 09:54:57 ↗ Hyperliquid SPCX 在 Hyperliquid 与 Binance 存在大幅价差，社区质疑未 rebase 导致多头损失

This feels like playing word games instead of protecting users, turning our bullish positions into pure gambling instead of investing based on stock fundamentals.

This feels like playing word games instead of protecting users, turning our bullish positions into pure gambling instead of investing based on stock fundamentals.