PredictThe group stage payout is done?
The group stage payout is done?
lopasitopappa参与话题 2消息总数 45
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 45 条，显示第 1-45 条Can we switch the team we selected?
Can we switch the team we selected?
Would be good to have faster resolution in order to have liquidity back during the wc
Would be good to have faster resolution in order to have liquidity back during the wc
When will it be fixed? Before tonight game?
When will it be fixed? Before tonight game?
To qualify for fanpoints and be able to lock the bet
To qualify for fanpoints and be able to lock the bet
Does it work with limit order?
Does it work with limit order?
the points are too low
the points are too low
how is this updated? doesnt't look right, is the mexico leaderboard
how is this updated? doesnt't look right, is the mexico leaderboard
to validate for fan points but true is YES only and is indicated
to validate for fan points but true is YES only and is indicated
i just bought 100 shares for NO czchia and didn't do nothing even tho czchia is my selected team
i just bought 100 shares for NO czchia and didn't do nothing even tho czchia is my selected team
.
.
is there any metadata in the api that tells u what submarket is the one chosen for the fan points, for example spread, would be good to have one if it doesn't exist rn
is there any metadata in the api that tells u what submarket is the one chosen for the fan points, for example spread, would be good to have one if it doesn't exist rn
colombia has ecuador flag
colombia has ecuador flag
Is there any requirement of buying as taker or maker to qualify for the fan points?
Is there any requirement of buying as taker or maker to qualify for the fan points?
What happens if there is a tie in the leaderbord?
What happens if there is a tie in the leaderbord?
Polymarketwhat is the cancel batch size limit now?
what is the cancel batch size limit now?
it will depend on the admin holdings
it will depend on the admin holdings
is polymarket, the rules are always unclear
is polymarket, the rules are always unclear
i also read "end second half"
i also read "end second half"
no
no
isnt end second half the same as FT?
isnt end second half the same as FT?
Oh i thought
Oh i thought
Unironically, probably it’s how thinks happen but i think is uma side
Unironically, probably it’s how thinks happen but i think is uma side
What does kalshi do?
What does kalshi do?
I doubt abandoned goes to denmark, how can u abandon a game ur winning before ft and still win
I doubt abandoned goes to denmark, how can u abandon a game ur winning before ft and still win
can i not arb between yes draw and yes denmark?
can i not arb between yes draw and yes denmark?
what are u holding?
what are u holding?
well if i were to gamble, i would buy YES draw or NO denmark is not a 100% but buyinh at 30c per share seems undervalued
well if i were to gamble, i would buy YES draw or NO denmark is not a 100% but buyinh at 30c per share seems undervalued
nothing, the game ended like minute 88
nothing, the game ended like minute 88
well, a ref in afcon did it lol
well, a ref in afcon did it lol
how is it different? the game was not played because it had no value, just like a friendly
how is it different? the game was not played because it had no value, just like a friendly
i think this is probably the most similar scenario of a game organized by fifa that had no sense to be replayed Brazil vs Argentina — World Cup qualifier, 5 Sep 2021 Suspended ~7 min in (0-0) when Brazilian health officials walked onto the pitch over COVID breaches by 4 Argentina players. Never restarted. FIFA ordered a replay, but both teams had already qualified → scrapped. No official result. FIFA's match centre logs it as cancelled: https://www.fifa.com/en/match-centre/match/520/282735/282737/400104558?date=2021-09-05
i think this is probably the most similar scenario of a game organized by fifa that had no sense to be replayed Brazil vs Argentina — World Cup qualifier, 5 Sep 2021 Suspended ~7 min in (0-0) when Brazilian health officials walked onto the pitch over COVID breaches by 4 Argentina players. Never restarted. FIFA ordered a replay, but both teams had already qualified → scrapped. No official result. FIFA's match centre logs it as cancelled: https://www.fifa.com/en/match-centre/match/520/282735/282737/400104558?date=2021-09-05
in the FIFA page, the H2H already indicate this game as draw
in the FIFA page, the H2H already indicate this game as draw
fifa
fifa
3-0 is for abandonment
3-0 is for abandonment
has this happened before on poly? because the market rules are clear: "In the upcoming game, scheduled for June 7, 2026 If Denmark wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead." I d'ont see FIFA declaring a game 2-1 that hasn't even reached 90 minutes
has this happened before on poly? because the market rules are clear: "In the upcoming game, scheduled for June 7, 2026 If Denmark wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead." I d'ont see FIFA declaring a game 2-1 that hasn't even reached 90 minutes
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
the website is unusuable when u have a lot of open positions, there is an issue of virtualization. Looks like a vibecoded website from gpt 3
the website is unusuable when u have a lot of open positions, there is an issue of virtualization. Looks like a vibecoded website from gpt 3
<@707597210845446214> can i get an answer on this, this heavily affects my trading... i bring 50k$+ actively in liquidity on TOB and i'm unable to operate properly rn.... Is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits per IP, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
<@707597210845446214> can i get an answer on this, this heavily affects my trading... i bring 50k$+ actively in liquidity on TOB and i'm unable to operate properly rn.... Is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits per IP, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it? this issue started with clob v2
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it? this issue started with clob v2
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
Hey, is Polymarket throttling heavy requoting? At ~250 requotes/sec on one maker (well within rate limits, zero 429s/1015s), my place latency floor jumps from 19ms to 400ms+ while cancels stay flat at ~30ms. It's confirmed server-side: a separate machine on a different IP placing the same wallet degrades at the same time and recovers the instant I stop. Orders aren't rejected, just slow, so it looks like contention on the place path, not a rate limit. Is this intentional, and how should I requote at volume without tripping it?
when is taker rebate live?
when is taker rebate live?
they have a cancel all endpoint that they don't even use
they have a cancel all endpoint that they don't even use