该用户的聊天记录定位。
The fastest connection might save us 20 ms, but it still can’t overcome the 250 ms maker-protection window. They can always cancel their orders.
The fastest connection might save us 20 ms, but it still can’t overcome the 250 ms maker-protection window. They can always cancel their orders.
Less than 0.1 ms? I don’t see how such a tiny duration could make a difference compared with network latency.
Less than 0.1 ms? I don’t see how such a tiny duration could make a difference compared with network latency.
It depends heavily on the server’s status.
It depends heavily on the server’s status.
I’ve optimized the server location and the code path for preparing signatures, and I submit same order N time asynchronously. The only thing I can imagine being faster than me is an internal API endpoint.
I’ve optimized the server location and the code path for preparing signatures, and I submit same order N time asynchronously. The only thing I can imagine being faster than me is an internal API endpoint.
Yeah, that’s a reason.
Yeah, that’s a reason.
That doesn’t fully explain my case. I was profitable even without the referral program before last month. That’s what makes me confused: I can accept that it no longer works, but I still don’t have a reasonable explanation for why.
That doesn’t fully explain my case. I was profitable even without the referral program before last month. That’s what makes me confused: I can accept that it no longer works, but I still don’t have a reasonable explanation for why.
That’s a good explanation. But the 250 ms maker protection has been in place for months, and this strategy has only become unfeasible since last month.
That’s a good explanation. But the 250 ms maker protection has been in place for months, and this strategy has only become unfeasible since last month.
Why is it no longer feasible? I mean, if the CEX price goes up, the YES/NO prices should move in the same direction.
Why is it no longer feasible? I mean, if the CEX price goes up, the YES/NO prices should move in the same direction.
LOL, so 250 ms is still nothing.
LOL, so 250 ms is still nothing.
Does the crypto market still use the 250 ms maker protection mechanism, where taker orders must wait 250 ms and makers can cancel their orders during that window?
Does the crypto market still use the 250 ms maker protection mechanism, where taker orders must wait 250 ms and makers can cancel their orders during that window?
Polymarket