yes, with a p90 cancel time of a few hundred ms
yes, with a p90 cancel time of a few hundred ms
2026-07-17 · Polymarket · 55 条相关讨论
yes, with a p90 cancel time of a few hundred ms
yes, with a p90 cancel time of a few hundred ms
Yes but cancels take 500ms dw
Yes but cancels take 500ms dw
LOL, so 250 ms is still nothing.
LOL, so 250 ms is still nothing.
How does anyone even make if that's the case?
How does anyone even make if that's the case?
everybody gets delayed
everybody gets delayed
taker delay of 250ms is also a minimum
taker delay of 250ms is also a minimum
reality is taker latencies often go p50 1s+
reality is taker latencies often go p50 1s+
We don't need taker delay
We don't need taker delay
let's remove it
let's remove it
😈 kalshi have TWAP so polymarket must have TWAP then kalshi don't have taker delay, why polymarket should have
😈 kalshi have TWAP so polymarket must have TWAP then kalshi don't have taker delay, why polymarket should have
I'm going to let Kalshi guys to mention "taker delay is bad, polymarket have , we don't" more on Twitter, then Polymarket might drop taker delay.
I'm going to let Kalshi guys to mention "taker delay is bad, polymarket have , we don't" more on Twitter, then Polymarket might drop taker delay.
Once polymarket is exactly the same as Kalshi but infra is worse, no reason for ppl to stay here
Once polymarket is exactly the same as Kalshi but infra is worse, no reason for ppl to stay here
I reckon there's more "smart dumb" money on polymarket still
I reckon there's more "smart dumb" money on polymarket still
how are you avoiding adverse fills?
how are you avoiding adverse fills?
mate 250 is what they say it is. in reality it's worse
mate 250 is what they say it is. in reality it's worse
ok ok ok - continue taking my money 🙇♂️
ok ok ok - continue taking my money 🙇♂️
if you already wanna flex here about not having issues with it, you should at least help us a tiny bit
if you already wanna flex here about not having issues with it, you should at least help us a tiny bit
Well you have high fees on PM like 2-4% plus the taker delay plus 5m markets are quite efficient
Well you have high fees on PM like 2-4% plus the taker delay plus 5m markets are quite efficient
It's a speed game you are not the fastest plus taker speed for available price is like 1500 ms
It's a speed game you are not the fastest plus taker speed for available price is like 1500 ms
That’s a good explanation. But the 250 ms maker protection has been in place for months, and this strategy has only become unfeasible since last month.
That’s a good explanation. But the 250 ms maker protection has been in place for months, and this strategy has only become unfeasible since last month.
its only unfeasible since you pay high fees + polymarket nerfed referral rewards
its only unfeasible since you pay high fees + polymarket nerfed referral rewards
so the bigger winners win more
so the bigger winners win more
and if u pay high fees u cant enter it
and if u pay high fees u cant enter it
kind of a monopoly
kind of a monopoly
I’ve optimized the server location and the code path for preparing signatures, and I submit same order N time asynchronously. The only thing I can imagine being faster than me is an internal API endpoint.
I’ve optimized the server location and the code path for preparing signatures, and I submit same order N time asynchronously. The only thing I can imagine being faster than me is an internal API endpoint.
The fastest connection might save us 20 ms, but it still can’t overcome the 250 ms maker-protection window. They can always cancel their orders.
The fastest connection might save us 20 ms, but it still can’t overcome the 250 ms maker-protection window. They can always cancel their orders.
What is the best proxy/aws server to have the lowest latency
What is the best proxy/aws server to have the lowest latency
where the CLOB is?
where the CLOB is?
obviously I don't know where the CLOB is located so that's why I'm asking
obviously I don't know where the CLOB is located so that's why I'm asking
or you can just spin up one us-east-1 and one eu-west-2 instance and ping the server
or you can just spin up one us-east-1 and one eu-west-2 instance and ping the server
Im getting ghost fills again
Im getting ghost fills again
anyone else?
anyone else?
<@1361217824776786031> twap gon cut this to 10k real quick btw
<@1361217824776786031> twap gon cut this to 10k real quick btw
and its not gon be cuttin out the manipulators
and its not gon be cuttin out the manipulators
lmao acc this might be genius
lmao acc this might be genius
kill volume, disincentivize manipulators from manipulating
kill volume, disincentivize manipulators from manipulating
idk whats to learn
idk whats to learn
we been yellin at them for months
we been yellin at them for months
they clearly dgaf
they clearly dgaf
manip wont care bout twap
manip wont care bout twap
dw
dw
if their best solution to this
if their best solution to this
their BEST solution is twap
their BEST solution is twap
so tehy wont be killed
so tehy wont be killed
About TWAP, I have a idea. <:pepecry:1480174599093096560> I think Polymarket only needs to adopt the same TWAP rules as Kalshi on 15m markets, while keeping 5m on the current rules for now. The upside: 1. Once 15m rules align with Kalshi, liquidity should start sharing immediately. 2. 5m stays as-is, so users still get choice: one product that matches the competitor, one that keeps drawing thrill-seekers. Right now 5m and 15m on Polymarket overlap completely, and 15m has almost no liquidity. If both switch to TWAP the same way, 5m will still cannibalize 15m liquidity.
About TWAP, I have a idea. <:pepecry:1480174599093096560> I think Polymarket only needs to adopt the same TWAP rules as Kalshi on 15m markets, while keeping 5m on the current rules for now. The upside: 1. Once 15m rules align with Kalshi, liquidity should start sharing immediately. 2. 5m stays as-is, so users still get choice: one product that matches the competitor, one that keeps drawing thrill-seekers. Right now 5m and 15m on Polymarket overlap completely, and 15m has almost no liquidity. If both switch to TWAP the same way, 5m will still cannibalize 15m liquidity.
good idea
good idea
thats based on the assumption that ppl gaf about twap
thats based on the assumption that ppl gaf about twap
ur assuming a mass migration will happen to twap
ur assuming a mass migration will happen to twap
thats not why kalshi has its volume
thats not why kalshi has its volume
they have volume cuz of user trust which poly no longer has for crypto
they have volume cuz of user trust which poly no longer has for crypto
<@1361217824776786031> bring back 500ms taker delay
<@1361217824776786031> bring back 500ms taker delay
either bring back the delay or lower the fees
either bring back the delay or lower the fees
one or the other
one or the other
Theyre great
Theyre great
But dead true
But dead true