does batching orders or cancels actually save on API limits now?
does batching orders or cancels actually save on API limits now?
2026-06-20 · Kalshi · 10 条相关讨论
does batching orders or cancels actually save on API limits now?
does batching orders or cancels actually save on API limits now?
no
no
then what the hell's the point of batching
then what the hell's the point of batching
See previous discussions. One might find latency advantages in some cases. One might also benefit from order of execution.
See previous discussions. One might find latency advantages in some cases. One might also benefit from order of execution.
I recall this comment from James, seems like the batch concept might be on the way out. I proactively removed support from my system. https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1511791137298452500
I recall this comment from James, seems like the batch concept might be on the way out. I proactively removed support from my system. https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1511791137298452500
Yes, but then <@1307399713108135956> pointed out that this is currently the only way to indicate to the exchange that you want to put requests into a particular order. (https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1511797177456791715) We are hoping that Kalshi takes user input into account before removing batch support.
Yes, but then <@1307399713108135956> pointed out that this is currently the only way to indicate to the exchange that you want to put requests into a particular order. (https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1511797177456791715) We are hoping that Kalshi takes user input into account before removing batch support.
I'm still a little unclear how batching would guarantee order of execution any better than individual order posts. Has anyone actually tested it? From the discussion the other week it sounded like it was just hypothetical
I'm still a little unclear how batching would guarantee order of execution any better than individual order posts. Has anyone actually tested it? From the discussion the other week it sounded like it was just hypothetical
Yes he confirmed that was how batch orders are processed but has anyone actually seen individual orders executed out of the order they were submitted?
Yes he confirmed that was how batch orders are processed but has anyone actually seen individual orders executed out of the order they were submitted?
James directly replied to you and confirmed that they execute in the specified order https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1511795384832495758
James directly replied to you and confirmed that they execute in the specified order https://discord.com/channels/871819895443189862/927686720990892032/1511795384832495758
yes, before i added batch support, i was submitting them in parallel and would sometimes have them execute out of order
yes, before i added batch support, i was submitting them in parallel and would sometimes have them execute out of order