are people actually seeing parallel single order creation be lower latency than batch? I've been experimenting ahead of transitioning to single order, and am fairly consistently finding the batch to be marginally lower latency than median parallel single order
are people actually seeing parallel single order creation be lower latency than batch? I've been experimenting ahead of transitioning to single order, and am fairly consistently finding the batch to be marginally lower latency than median parallel single order
I tested various approaches using the CloudFront hostname a while back and found it could be faster in some cases to use the batching.
I tested various approaches using the CloudFront hostname a while back and found it could be faster in some cases to use the batching.
I think it really depends on your use case. If you can have multiple requests in flight in parallel and don’t wait for the response, it can be faster to take advantage of the load balancer.
I think it really depends on your use case. If you can have multiple requests in flight in parallel and don’t wait for the response, it can be faster to take advantage of the load balancer.
But if your requests are for the same market, they are probably going to be serialized at some point anyway.
But if your requests are for the same market, they are probably going to be serialized at some point anyway.
hmm yes, seems like I don't have enough threads to fully parallelize signing 20 orders, so batches of 20 is more efficient because of that bottleneck
hmm yes, seems like I don't have enough threads to fully parallelize signing 20 orders, so batches of 20 is more efficient because of that bottleneck