2026-06-24 · Kalshi · 60 条相关讨论
liquidity rewards dont seem to be close to accurate recently. I've had over 50% of closest quotes on this market today, which should be ~$4/hr, and I have earned $0.16? I'd like to mm these, but only if I'll actually earn the incentives listed
liquidity rewards dont seem to be close to accurate recently. I've had over 50% of closest quotes on this market today, which should be ~$4/hr, and I have earned $0.16? I'd like to mm these, but only if I'll actually earn the incentives listed
better tracking would be appreciated here too
better tracking would be appreciated here too
It’s $200 for the whole time period not $200 per day. So, that’s about $9/day and around $0.40/hour. So, $0.20/hour per side.
It’s $200 for the whole time period not $200 per day. So, that’s about $9/day and around $0.40/hour. So, $0.20/hour per side.
ah for some reason I thought these were all daily rewards. thanks
ah for some reason I thought these were all daily rewards. thanks
gmgm, where can I apply to market make combos on Kalshi?
gmgm, where can I apply to market make combos on Kalshi?
Please add a minimum lot size to qualify. There is one clown who puts a 0.01 share resting order at the top of the book to try and throw off incentive rewards. Seems like a flagrant violation of the spirit of the program. Cant even buy his 0.01 share as you'd lose a penny. Seems abusive to the program. Thanks
Please add a minimum lot size to qualify. There is one clown who puts a 0.01 share resting order at the top of the book to try and throw off incentive rewards. Seems like a flagrant violation of the spirit of the program. Cant even buy his 0.01 share as you'd lose a penny. Seems abusive to the program. Thanks
Agreed finance, it’s said everyday
Agreed finance, it’s said everyday
I was coming back here to say it actually myself
I was coming back here to say it actually myself
Yeah, seems like a version of spoofing the rewards. I'd add a min size to qualify and ban this user. Clearly violating the spirit of the program with their abusive practices. Wouldn't be hard to identify the user
Yeah, seems like a version of spoofing the rewards. I'd add a min size to qualify and ban this user. Clearly violating the spirit of the program with their abusive practices. Wouldn't be hard to identify the user
Ironic, the changes they made to the program all DIS-incentivize liquidity haha
Ironic, the changes they made to the program all DIS-incentivize liquidity haha
I noticed new text that says if your earnings are less than $1 then you don't get any rewards. Hard for me to imagine these .01 bids are ever getting up to $1. Maybe resources are better spent on combating the penny jumping bots that post 169 shares above yours no matter the price
I noticed new text that says if your earnings are less than $1 then you don't get any rewards. Hard for me to imagine these .01 bids are ever getting up to $1. Maybe resources are better spent on combating the penny jumping bots that post 169 shares above yours no matter the price
They do, because being top of the order book has them at 100% efficiency. That is why they spoof every open market
They do, because being top of the order book has them at 100% efficiency. That is why they spoof every open market
okay then join them for .01 and reap the bountiful rewards?
okay then join them for .01 and reap the bountiful rewards?
In this example let's say the FV was 86c. Strike pays $80 for the full duration. How much is that .01 making vs how much am I losing assuming no convergence to FV?
In this example let's say the FV was 86c. Strike pays $80 for the full duration. How much is that .01 making vs how much am I losing assuming no convergence to FV?
I could be wrong, but I believe he’s getting all of the rewards on the N side. But check in an hour to see if you’re accumulating rewards or not.
I could be wrong, but I believe he’s getting all of the rewards on the N side. But check in an hour to see if you’re accumulating rewards or not.
Guys... chill Lior is working on it
Guys... chill Lior is working on it
Eveyone agrees there needs to be a minimum bid size... my proposal is 100 shares
Eveyone agrees there needs to be a minimum bid size... my proposal is 100 shares
(respectively if you can't afford 100 shares you probably don't care about rewards anyways)
(respectively if you can't afford 100 shares you probably don't care about rewards anyways)
Hold over the blue active dot to see your efficiency. Some markets the 2nd order is 0% efficiency. You might be risking $850 for 0 or 50% efficiency versus someone risking a penny. Ridiculous
Hold over the blue active dot to see your efficiency. Some markets the 2nd order is 0% efficiency. You might be risking $850 for 0 or 50% efficiency versus someone risking a penny. Ridiculous
I don't understand why people keep suggesting a flat threshold as the solution. Surely some scaling formula would be better. If my 5k is getting jumped by 101 shares it's not really that different from getting jumped by 0.01.
I don't understand why people keep suggesting a flat threshold as the solution. Surely some scaling formula would be better. If my 5k is getting jumped by 101 shares it's not really that different from getting jumped by 0.01.