is there anyone that was getting 400s for rfqs that's no longer getting 400s?
is there anyone that was getting 400s for rfqs that's no longer getting 400s?
2026-06-24 · Kalshi · 38 条相关讨论
is there anyone that was getting 400s for rfqs that's no longer getting 400s?
is there anyone that was getting 400s for rfqs that's no longer getting 400s?
Still getting 400s here.
Still getting 400s here.
Yes, like many others here.
Yes, like many others here.
Still getting 400s
Still getting 400s
I just posted about our issue in the bug channel for awareness if you guys want to take a look at it or add to it
I just posted about our issue in the bug channel for awareness if you guys want to take a look at it or add to it
None of us post RFQs we are responding to them
None of us post RFQs we are responding to them
Yeah, only responding to RFQs/Combos, not doing anything that would be construed as spamming. Decent volume as well, 5+ million filled in the last couple weeks.
Yeah, only responding to RFQs/Combos, not doing anything that would be construed as spamming. Decent volume as well, 5+ million filled in the last couple weeks.
Yeah 100%. I don’t feel like my bot was spamming either but I would be happy to change behavior according to any guidelines
Yeah 100%. I don’t feel like my bot was spamming either but I would be happy to change behavior according to any guidelines
if these are in fact bans rather than a technical error, kalshi is within their rights to enact them, but should do so transparently > RULE 3.11 REJECTION OF APPLICANT AND LIMITATIONS OF TRADING PRIVILEGES > (a) Notwithstanding Kalshi’s authority granted under any other Rule, Kalshi may, in its sole discretion, deny any Member Application, or suspend, revoke, limit, condition, restrict, or qualify the trading privileges of any Trader) or Authorized Trader of a Member as it deems necessary or appropriate. > (b) Anyone who has had trading privileges limited pursuant to Section (a) of this Rule will be provided, in writing, the reason such action was taken.
if these are in fact bans rather than a technical error, kalshi is within their rights to enact them, but should do so transparently > RULE 3.11 REJECTION OF APPLICANT AND LIMITATIONS OF TRADING PRIVILEGES > (a) Notwithstanding Kalshi’s authority granted under any other Rule, Kalshi may, in its sole discretion, deny any Member Application, or suspend, revoke, limit, condition, restrict, or qualify the trading privileges of any Trader) or Authorized Trader of a Member as it deems necessary or appropriate. > (b) Anyone who has had trading privileges limited pursuant to Section (a) of this Rule will be provided, in writing, the reason such action was taken.
I'd pay 75c for they're not shadow banning.
I'd pay 75c for they're not shadow banning.
hm, on every POST call seems quite strange, I'll look into it
hm, on every POST call seems quite strange, I'll look into it
Anyone seeing weird fills coming in on RFQ's, despite not currently quoting
Anyone seeing weird fills coming in on RFQ's, despite not currently quoting
There’s been a ton of messages in this channel on the issue. Happy to provide more insight in DMs! It started on 6/19 around 19:14 UTC for a lot of us after no issues before
There’s been a ton of messages in this channel on the issue. Happy to provide more insight in DMs! It started on 6/19 around 19:14 UTC for a lot of us after no issues before
are none getting through at all? or just a small number of them
are none getting through at all? or just a small number of them
Every POST returns 400 for invalid parameters but according to the API our parameters look to be correct. I sent some emails to the main support account with a lot of details I’d be happy to share
Every POST returns 400 for invalid parameters but according to the API our parameters look to be correct. I sent some emails to the main support account with a lot of details I’d be happy to share
Happened out of nowhere. Quoting was perfectly fine and then all of the sudden only 400s
Happened out of nowhere. Quoting was perfectly fine and then all of the sudden only 400s
Thanks for the response here. Unfortunately I don’t think that is it. None of us had changed anything in our quote payload for days before the issues started. I use three decimal places and I get rejected every time. Just like <@872238471593492520> said it was out of nowhere. I am happy to send example payloads if that would help
Thanks for the response here. Unfortunately I don’t think that is it. None of us had changed anything in our quote payload for days before the issues started. I use three decimal places and I get rejected every time. Just like <@872238471593492520> said it was out of nowhere. I am happy to send example payloads if that would help
100% failure rate since Friday afternoon, millions in volume in the previous weeks. 400 invalid parameters.
100% failure rate since Friday afternoon, millions in volume in the previous weeks. 400 invalid parameters.
ok we are working on fixing but might take a bit
ok we are working on fixing but might take a bit
they probably should've been 429s
they probably should've been 429s