2026-07-04 · Polymarket · 45 条相关讨论
Is this not an insult on 4th of july? https://polymarket.com/event/will-trump-publicly-insult-someone-onptptpt-20260630182730878/will-donald-trump-publicly-insult-someone-on-july-4-2026-20260630182730882
Is this not an insult on 4th of july? https://polymarket.com/event/will-trump-publicly-insult-someone-onptptpt-20260630182730878/will-donald-trump-publicly-insult-someone-on-july-4-2026-20260630182730882
I think it needs to be written, verbal or spoken? Dunno if image based counts?
I think it needs to be written, verbal or spoken? Dunno if image based counts?
Hmm yeah idk either
Hmm yeah idk either
yeah image based counts we had a market resolving off of this in may
yeah image based counts we had a market resolving off of this in may
But i think ive seen it resolve based on pics before
But i think ive seen it resolve based on pics before
Yeah exactly, so it should be yes because it was in the middle of the night which is on 4th july et
Yeah exactly, so it should be yes because it was in the middle of the night which is on 4th july et
2:11 am et yes
2:11 am et yes
why would it count
why would it count
Read
Read
The Subjects: The image displays a side-by-side comparison of the fictional comedic character Pee-wee Herman (left) and Democratic U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff (right). The Implication: Pee-wee Herman is famously known as a quirky, goofy, and childish character. Comparing a politician to a silly fictional character is a common tactic used to belittle them, suggesting they are unserious, weak, or lack the authority expected of a leader.
The Subjects: The image displays a side-by-side comparison of the fictional comedic character Pee-wee Herman (left) and Democratic U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff (right). The Implication: Pee-wee Herman is famously known as a quirky, goofy, and childish character. Comparing a politician to a silly fictional character is a common tactic used to belittle them, suggesting they are unserious, weak, or lack the authority expected of a leader.
i get you but you are inferring its negative
i get you but you are inferring its negative
Also posted this one
Also posted this one
Think it’s pretty clear
Think it’s pretty clear
yeah
yeah
It should count
It should count
yea these are Y
yea these are Y
e.g.: > Per market rules, any public statement in which Trump insults, mocks or attacks the listed individual “will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.” Donald Trump’s May 30 Truth Social post containing an image of Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens captioned “Get in loser, we’re going losing” constitutes a qualifying insult for each of those individuals (see: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116665677662591058).
e.g.: > Per market rules, any public statement in which Trump insults, mocks or attacks the listed individual “will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.” Donald Trump’s May 30 Truth Social post containing an image of Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens captioned “Get in loser, we’re going losing” constitutes a qualifying insult for each of those individuals (see: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116665677662591058).
neither counts
neither counts
insult has to be written
insult has to be written
No Remember that garbage pic that he posted
No Remember that garbage pic that he posted
I would not dispute this <:Shrug:1306491719201849364>
I would not dispute this <:Shrug:1306491719201849364>
Its public mockery
Its public mockery
always derisk
always derisk
there was a good spot at 30ct to sell
there was a good spot at 30ct to sell
even later at 20+ct
even later at 20+ct
which one?
which one?
its one of the hardest things to do xd
its one of the hardest things to do xd
anyones trade history not showing up on ui?
anyones trade history not showing up on ui?
get in loser?
get in loser?
public statement that mocks
public statement that mocks
where do you see the statement?
where do you see the statement?
yup, the one that raskell quoted
yup, the one that raskell quoted
it's a clarif from that day i think
it's a clarif from that day i think
pics count
pics count
thonker wouldnt dispute this
thonker wouldnt dispute this
no way
no way
if the ai counted, these ones have to as well, can't make it in any other way
if the ai counted, these ones have to as well, can't make it in any other way
What about July 1 market for the insulting?
What about July 1 market for the insulting?
Is that a bond or what?
Is that a bond or what?
what were the insults there? i don't watch the market every day
what were the insults there? i don't watch the market every day
I don't know I had gemini scan check everyhting and it said that he insulted NATO
I don't know I had gemini scan check everyhting and it said that he insulted NATO
absolutely useless to ask AI for that market
absolutely useless to ask AI for that market
lol, insulting NATO doesn't count at all
lol, insulting NATO doesn't count at all
Using AI is putting yourself being, no? Helps you find quick conclusion based on topics.
Using AI is putting yourself being, no? Helps you find quick conclusion based on topics.
i don't see any posts that would be good enough, but i'll go through his truth social, because i have a ping system on discord for this and the timezones fk it up
i don't see any posts that would be good enough, but i'll go through his truth social, because i have a ping system on discord for this and the timezones fk it up