HyperliquidBiggest flaw of hyperliquid is only housing the current trend atm
Biggest flaw of hyperliquid is only housing the current trend atm
Elq参与话题 5消息总数 33
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 33 条，显示第 1-33 条seems hyperliquid getting bottleneck cuz of hype price cuz no hip3 listing frugal crypto listing dunno, only delistings, kinda ass hopefully team dumps cuz at this rate we housing nothing but fkn freeloaders
seems hyperliquid getting bottleneck cuz of hype price cuz no hip3 listing frugal crypto listing dunno, only delistings, kinda ass hopefully team dumps cuz at this rate we housing nothing but fkn freeloaders
FTT pls, was a mistake to delist it pls
FTT pls, was a mistake to delist it pls
I give up You win You are right Fuck you
I give up You win You are right Fuck you
Isolated margin liquidation and stop losses are certainly not the same thing no EDIT CUZ OF COOLDOWN NOÔOOOO SL ARE UNRELIABLE THE F WHO TRADES WITH SLS WTFFF Anyways im gonna have ton give up on you sorry you just cant get the idea that it is actually nothing much to ask you just throw 10/10 around like you have PTSD
Isolated margin liquidation and stop losses are certainly not the same thing no EDIT CUZ OF COOLDOWN NOÔOOOO SL ARE UNRELIABLE THE F WHO TRADES WITH SLS WTFFF Anyways im gonna have ton give up on you sorry you just cant get the idea that it is actually nothing much to ask you just throw 10/10 around like you have PTSD
What stop loss are you talking about ??? This already exists This is a liquidation of an isolated position yes
What stop loss are you talking about ??? This already exists This is a liquidation of an isolated position yes
If you use 0.25% then in our arbitrary numbers you can scalp 4 sht at the same time with 1k but thats all arbitrary Its just to give an idea
If you use 0.25% then in our arbitrary numbers you can scalp 4 sht at the same time with 1k but thats all arbitrary Its just to give an idea
985 exactly Half of margin should still be demanded to avoid bad debt for HL in the event of a 10/10 this is not intial margin because what is at stake is 15$ You can totally have 2 scalping positions but you just eneed more money Need to establish a robust formula but it IS DOABLE are every hypetards like this
985 exactly Half of margin should still be demanded to avoid bad debt for HL in the event of a 10/10 this is not intial margin because what is at stake is 15$ You can totally have 2 scalping positions but you just eneed more money Need to establish a robust formula but it IS DOABLE are every hypetards like this
You cannot, remember ? its locked until you get out of that pos anyway
You cannot, remember ? its locked until you get out of that pos anyway
No. This works only in isolated margining which is very common when scalping No scalper does cross u idiot
No. This works only in isolated margining which is very common when scalping No scalper does cross u idiot
Okay Lets say you have 1000$ on your acc and you risk 1% per trade You should be allowed to have the right to long or short btc to $2k risking only 10$ + 5$ so 15$ margin for protection against bad debt as long as 1k$ is sitting on that acc Sounds fair or NOT
Okay Lets say you have 1000$ on your acc and you risk 1% per trade You should be allowed to have the right to long or short btc to $2k risking only 10$ + 5$ so 15$ margin for protection against bad debt as long as 1k$ is sitting on that acc Sounds fair or NOT
200x was arbitrary I dont do more than 125x
200x was arbitrary I dont do more than 125x
Youre telling me there is no possible way at all ? Cant you just cap it depending on how much you actually have sleeping on ur acc ? So we are sure that you are a scalper that risk for ex 1% so u are allowed to do it you are telling me that this is not possible ? In this case james wynn would have needed A SHT TON of money sleeping on his acc Sounds fair ? Did i just figure out the solution for you ? Like did we do it guys ? We figured out the solution ? That was HARD
Youre telling me there is no possible way at all ? Cant you just cap it depending on how much you actually have sleeping on ur acc ? So we are sure that you are a scalper that risk for ex 1% so u are allowed to do it you are telling me that this is not possible ? In this case james wynn would have needed A SHT TON of money sleeping on his acc Sounds fair ? Did i just figure out the solution for you ? Like did we do it guys ? We figured out the solution ? That was HARD
so how come asterdex can do it ?
so how come asterdex can do it ?
He cant because he cant long that much Remember ? We limit the position value depending of lev
He cant because he cant long that much Remember ? We limit the position value depending of lev
The very reason im asking for 200x is because i know to size my bets depending on the edge i suppose i have ? You think the traders who need x200 just go press long with 200x with all their cap ? Have you ever traded seriously ? You must be joking Thats exactly my point HL does not have x200 lev with limited position value because it does not want to deal with ppl that know to manage risk
The very reason im asking for 200x is because i know to size my bets depending on the edge i suppose i have ? You think the traders who need x200 just go press long with 200x with all their cap ? Have you ever traded seriously ? You must be joking Thats exactly my point HL does not have x200 lev with limited position value because it does not want to deal with ppl that know to manage risk
to be fair man the fact no hypetard can actually have any form of objective and truth seeking approach in regards to the present infrastructure's biggest bottleneck is pretty telling about the future of hl feel free to expose urself but do it responsibly, with a reasonable amount of exposure and you shall not lcys terrific behaviors
to be fair man the fact no hypetard can actually have any form of objective and truth seeking approach in regards to the present infrastructure's biggest bottleneck is pretty telling about the future of hl feel free to expose urself but do it responsibly, with a reasonable amount of exposure and you shall not lcys terrific behaviors
It is doable and i have already provided you with the explanation as to why it has not happened yet on hl Protecting the shtty uncompetitive clankers cuz hlp does not want to incur any form of risk at all which doesnt make sense, that HLP curve on all time is the same receipts as a rigged casino is it not ?
It is doable and i have already provided you with the explanation as to why it has not happened yet on hl Protecting the shtty uncompetitive clankers cuz hlp does not want to incur any form of risk at all which doesnt make sense, that HLP curve on all time is the same receipts as a rigged casino is it not ?
Yeah ? Relative to avail. margin then sounds fair ? You telling me that is not possible ? Why possible elsewhere
Yeah ? Relative to avail. margin then sounds fair ? You telling me that is not possible ? Why possible elsewhere
Limit position value depending of lev ??????
Limit position value depending of lev ??????
Just need 200x Limit position value depending on lev Scalpers dont crank risk up and create risk anyway they do volume Thats not doable ? How is that not doable ? No the reality is that hl is protecting its uncompetitive dogsht market makers with shtty clankers from humans thats all there is to it
Just need 200x Limit position value depending on lev Scalpers dont crank risk up and create risk anyway they do volume Thats not doable ? How is that not doable ? No the reality is that hl is protecting its uncompetitive dogsht market makers with shtty clankers from humans thats all there is to it
Hl does most of it better still It just frustrating to use so much dexes and cexes just dont get it why its so stubborn that specific point I get that the delisting bs must happen its democracy and decentralization its a natural process
Hl does most of it better still It just frustrating to use so much dexes and cexes just dont get it why its so stubborn that specific point I get that the delisting bs must happen its democracy and decentralization its a natural process
Hopefully some high quality dex takes over cuz clearly we're getting complacent at hyperliquid Nowadays nothing but a casino supported by shallow retards that are protected structurally who really believe ppl will continue to trade on it when relationship between traders and liq providers too asymmetrical There are already dexes that do it correctly but the biggest one cannot ? sure buddy
Hopefully some high quality dex takes over cuz clearly we're getting complacent at hyperliquid Nowadays nothing but a casino supported by shallow retards that are protected structurally who really believe ppl will continue to trade on it when relationship between traders and liq providers too asymmetrical There are already dexes that do it correctly but the biggest one cannot ? sure buddy
To protect users ??? How does that help ? Who ? We already have isolated margining for protection + Limiting position value depending of lev can be done in a way that protects users while allows scalping did you even read it correctly, scalpers dont do huge positions anyway they do VOLUME Sincerely, if you don't know what i'm talking about just check out asterdex for example, on the point of scalping theyre doing it right You cannot scalp sht on hyperliquid and you are trying to justify it somehow We aint housing sht
To protect users ??? How does that help ? Who ? We already have isolated margining for protection + Limiting position value depending of lev can be done in a way that protects users while allows scalping did you even read it correctly, scalpers dont do huge positions anyway they do VOLUME Sincerely, if you don't know what i'm talking about just check out asterdex for example, on the point of scalping theyre doing it right You cannot scalp sht on hyperliquid and you are trying to justify it somehow We aint housing sht
The delisting trend by validators on hyperliquid is problematic, we should strive to list as much as we can if we aim to house all finance, even if we have to limit leverage to x1 We're not aiming to house all finance anymore ? From housing all finance to "temporarily housing the ongoing uptrend", that is absolutely nuts and that is not what was promised with hyperliquid Clearly the HLP vault is not incurring enough risk, it is too asymmetrical between traders and the liquidity providers, people shouldnt be seeing the HLP vault as "free money" like they actually clearly do, which undeniably creates a systemic risk or get hyperliquid to suffer from a bottleneck somewhere someway somehow Alsow we should increase leverage while limit position values depending on leverage to allow scalpers on hyperliquid without giving in to the risk of insider trading issue and attacks, which is not the case at the moment, so I guess we're just picking on who we are housing as well ? Something is off with hyperliquid Been trading for ages there now, lots of things ive been expecting to happen naturally over time did not happen and perhaps we have deviated from the direction of "housing all finance" and it just took me too much time to realize ? By order of priority 1) allow scalpers on hl, position value limits depending lev up to 200x lev, that would be awesome as fuck, shouldnt be hard to come up with a robust formula for that... 2) delisting is cringe
The delisting trend by validators on hyperliquid is problematic, we should strive to list as much as we can if we aim to house all finance, even if we have to limit leverage to x1 We're not aiming to house all finance anymore ? From housing all finance to "temporarily housing the ongoing uptrend", that is absolutely nuts and that is not what was promised with hyperliquid Clearly the HLP vault is not incurring enough risk, it is too asymmetrical between traders and the liquidity providers, people shouldnt be seeing the HLP vault as "free money" like they actually clearly do, which undeniably creates a systemic risk or get hyperliquid to suffer from a bottleneck somewhere someway somehow Alsow we should increase leverage while limit position values depending on leverage to allow scalpers on hyperliquid without giving in to the risk of insider trading issue and attacks, which is not the case at the moment, so I guess we're just picking on who we are housing as well ? Something is off with hyperliquid Been trading for ages there now, lots of things ive been expecting to happen naturally over time did not happen and perhaps we have deviated from the direction of "housing all finance" and it just took me too much time to realize ? By order of priority 1) allow scalpers on hl, position value limits depending lev up to 200x lev, that would be awesome as fuck, shouldnt be hard to come up with a robust formula for that... 2) delisting is cringe
From housing all finance to "temporarily housing the ongoing uptrend", that is absolutely nuts
From housing all finance to "temporarily housing the ongoing uptrend", that is absolutely nuts
How did we get from "housing all finance" to fucking "validator vote to delist TON" nah this is getting cringe af
How did we get from "housing all finance" to fucking "validator vote to delist TON" nah this is getting cringe af
can we stop delisting sht like this is fkn cringe those validator votes what the fuck, werent we fucking going to house all finance
can we stop delisting sht like this is fkn cringe those validator votes what the fuck, werent we fucking going to house all finance
am short hype tbh
am short hype tbh
shorting hype ngl
shorting hype ngl
thanks for having delisted ftt it's funny how i had to go buy spot on a fkin cex to get exposure for today's pump, can we stop this delisting bullshit please there are still serious traders on hl
thanks for having delisted ftt it's funny how i had to go buy spot on a fkin cex to get exposure for today's pump, can we stop this delisting bullshit please there are still serious traders on hl
Request : vaults back at 100$ the one who decided 10k was a fair price to access vault deployment was objectively not cooking
Request : vaults back at 100$ the one who decided 10k was a fair price to access vault deployment was objectively not cooking
Why vaults cost 10k to deploy now ? 100$ was genuinely a fair price
Why vaults cost 10k to deploy now ? 100$ was genuinely a fair price