该用户的聊天记录定位。
Unreal
Unreal
Damn it's literally over? I just clicked on the crack streams link
Damn it's literally over? I just clicked on the crack streams link
World Cup : there was a time when **clicking on the team's logo in the individual matches would take you to their World Cup record **and who all they have played. that is no longer working on this current round of matches. **Can we please bring that back**? I understand someone was saying you wouldn't want to click on the logo on the main matches page, where all the matches are listed, and have that take you to their individual team record and stats, but instead take you to the page of their next match. They are probably correct. however, once you have clicked on a match, having the logos at that point link to their team page with their record is ideal
World Cup : there was a time when **clicking on the team's logo in the individual matches would take you to their World Cup record **and who all they have played. that is no longer working on this current round of matches. **Can we please bring that back**? I understand someone was saying you wouldn't want to click on the logo on the main matches page, where all the matches are listed, and have that take you to their individual team record and stats, but instead take you to the page of their next match. They are probably correct. however, once you have clicked on a match, having the logos at that point link to their team page with their record is ideal
.grant_mowles. 👈 <@1356604771208790198> Please ban this scammer just posted a phishing link in here
.grant_mowles. 👈 <@1356604771208790198> Please ban this scammer just posted a phishing link in here
<@1356604771208790198> For context, this guy earned 867 in rewards one day ago, And $870 in rewards six hours ago, And the last volume he put on the platform was four days ago. 3 days ago, presumably for the volume accrued 4 days ago, He got $2K rewards... Proceeded to not put in anymore volume to date and still made another ~ $2K LP rewards somehow
<@1356604771208790198> For context, this guy earned 867 in rewards one day ago, And $870 in rewards six hours ago, And the last volume he put on the platform was four days ago. 3 days ago, presumably for the volume accrued 4 days ago, He got $2K rewards... Proceeded to not put in anymore volume to date and still made another ~ $2K LP rewards somehow
Better example
Better example
Damn they get paid multiple times per day too. Probably had that happen once in 4 years<:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
Damn they get paid multiple times per day too. Probably had that happen once in 4 years<:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
Yeah me too I was thinking over time how could it be profitable? Did you try putting your order where their order is on top of theirs? for instance when I take one of these guys orders and it fills the little 15 dinky shares w.e, whatever I have left in the order gets left on the book (shocker, I know) and if I cancel, they replace immediately but if I leave order there, they don't. Same for you?
Yeah me too I was thinking over time how could it be profitable? Did you try putting your order where their order is on top of theirs? for instance when I take one of these guys orders and it fills the little 15 dinky shares w.e, whatever I have left in the order gets left on the book (shocker, I know) and if I cancel, they replace immediately but if I leave order there, they don't. Same for you?
Worse than yesterday. Way worse
Worse than yesterday. Way worse
Sorry the mods have to bear the brunt of it when it obviously is not your fault. You know how it is when people, as they say in France, *fk with your money*, though. They are just frustrated and you happen to be the conduit to pass along that frustration to the powers that be. Just let it pass all the way through you and don't touch anything metal in the meantime and you'll be good <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
Sorry the mods have to bear the brunt of it when it obviously is not your fault. You know how it is when people, as they say in France, *fk with your money*, though. They are just frustrated and you happen to be the conduit to pass along that frustration to the powers that be. Just let it pass all the way through you and don't touch anything metal in the meantime and you'll be good <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
Schrodinger's orders. They're both filled and not filled at the same time<:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
Schrodinger's orders. They're both filled and not filled at the same time<:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>
whoever was saying that once they click combo they get stuck in combo mode Use back on your browser or device to go to the previous page. I couldn't exit out of it either for the longest but that's all you have to do
whoever was saying that once they click combo they get stuck in combo mode Use back on your browser or device to go to the previous page. I couldn't exit out of it either for the longest but that's all you have to do
How frequently is it? every LP market?
How frequently is it? every LP market?
I've also heard that they will immediately reduce once you put your liquidity down, not taken off completely but cut by 50% or w.e.
I've also heard that they will immediately reduce once you put your liquidity down, not taken off completely but cut by 50% or w.e.
But who is doing that? I heard someone else complaining about that the other day. it's pm? I mean, how could it be anybody else ig... But I don't know seems like a lot of work all just to try and not give people the incentive that you offered them 🤷♂️
But who is doing that? I heard someone else complaining about that the other day. it's pm? I mean, how could it be anybody else ig... But I don't know seems like a lot of work all just to try and not give people the incentive that you offered them 🤷♂️
tyty. And it never happens on a market without rewards? because that is mostly what I have been on lately and I have not noticed it. And also that would be pretty big tell that it has to do with the reward farming
tyty. And it never happens on a market without rewards? because that is mostly what I have been on lately and I have not noticed it. And also that would be pretty big tell that it has to do with the reward farming
Some of my referrals definitely don't know shit about checking on chain. Be nice to explain this to them so they are not tricked by the UI into losing all their money
Some of my referrals definitely don't know shit about checking on chain. Be nice to explain this to them so they are not tricked by the UI into losing all their money
Did you get a notification for the 19 that did fill? Did it say order has been partially filled or filled?
Did you get a notification for the 19 that did fill? Did it say order has been partially filled or filled?
So this is the shit they're talking about when people are saying that it's fake liquidity. Been seeing quite a few murmurings about that lately
So this is the shit they're talking about when people are saying that it's fake liquidity. Been seeing quite a few murmurings about that lately
have you noticed is it only in markets where there are rewards?
have you noticed is it only in markets where there are rewards?
Or that was the size that you put in order in for and it did appear to be filled but you never got those shares except for the 19 That it shows in the history?
Or that was the size that you put in order in for and it did appear to be filled but you never got those shares except for the 19 That it shows in the history?
OK, but if you don't get any notification about an order being filled from the system and you don't have it on chain where does the 361 shares number come from? I understand you may not know, but I'm asking, it just shows up randomly, or it shows up when you place an order of a different size or..?
OK, but if you don't get any notification about an order being filled from the system and you don't have it on chain where does the 361 shares number come from? I understand you may not know, but I'm asking, it just shows up randomly, or it shows up when you place an order of a different size or..?
And no notification for polymarket? cancel or processed or anything?
And no notification for polymarket? cancel or processed or anything?
You tried "control shift r"? That always gets all my shares to finally show up. but I understand UI issues are a different thing, you mean even in the wallet the transaction shows us not having gone through?
You tried "control shift r"? That always gets all my shares to finally show up. but I understand UI issues are a different thing, you mean even in the wallet the transaction shows us not having gone through?
Oh and and I guess others had as well and they were chatting about it, that's where I read it for sure
Oh and and I guess others had as well and they were chatting about it, that's where I read it for sure
damn I totally forgot about that. unreal times. Did it ever come out how they were doing that? That's Ghost fill related?
damn I totally forgot about that. unreal times. Did it ever come out how they were doing that? That's Ghost fill related?
Not you but they*
Not you but they*
And you don't think it could just be so that you could watch the development of the underlying and then adjust your order after the fact accordingly,? moves in your favor, let the transaction go through, Moves against, cancel it.
And you don't think it could just be so that you could watch the development of the underlying and then adjust your order after the fact accordingly,? moves in your favor, let the transaction go through, Moves against, cancel it.
OK OK I'm with you and and and how is this different, They can't do it to an order from the past now?
OK OK I'm with you and and and how is this different, They can't do it to an order from the past now?
post dating it or pre dating it or something
post dating it or pre dating it or something
Yes Sir, I heard something about this. Wow you just gave me deja vu. perhaps it was you Sir were talking about this maybe the other day or something? It is something about the timestamp I think you're right
Yes Sir, I heard something about this. Wow you just gave me deja vu. perhaps it was you Sir were talking about this maybe the other day or something? It is something about the timestamp I think you're right
Well that sounds a lot like the old ghost fills to me. Brutal
Well that sounds a lot like the old ghost fills to me. Brutal
And you do or do not think it is related to the overpayment of LP rewards to people who are not putting in volume?
And you do or do not think it is related to the overpayment of LP rewards to people who are not putting in volume?
What makes you think they're old wallets? which "it" you refer to?
What makes you think they're old wallets? which "it" you refer to?
Would you mind explaining this to me a little more please?
Would you mind explaining this to me a little more please?
But you know what's funny is that I had originally read somewhere that shit like this may not be possible to avoid somehow or something... when other places seem to do it with zero problems so idk
But you know what's funny is that I had originally read somewhere that shit like this may not be possible to avoid somehow or something... when other places seem to do it with zero problems so idk
Man I thought we had gone through that! that was the whole thing about Clob V2, I thought right? is that we weren't gonna have ghost fills anymore<:PepeSuit:1040246863145730119>
Man I thought we had gone through that! that was the whole thing about Clob V2, I thought right? is that we weren't gonna have ghost fills anymore<:PepeSuit:1040246863145730119>
youliterally beat me to it LOL
youliterally beat me to it LOL
Damn the very last guy on the list literally did zero. and just got paid $745 that some legitimate market maker providing liquidity for rewards should have been paid instead. Criminals
Damn the very last guy on the list literally did zero. and just got paid $745 that some legitimate market maker providing liquidity for rewards should have been paid instead. Criminals
To be a little more explicit diesel, so we're on the same page... Look at the difference between the accounts highlighted in black and accounts highlighted in red. The ones in black are the known legitimate accounts, by known legitimate traders. see their percentage rewards allotted per their volume. I think in the highest case is like 2%. Now look at the proportion of rewards the ones highlighted in red were given versus how much volume they actually put in. sometimes 1400%. so you have Ultra Lisk putting in $100,000 of volume and farming 940, And then you have *fdsasfjbccfssgk* (sp?) who did $61 of volume and farmed $1.1 K. several examples on the same sheet
To be a little more explicit diesel, so we're on the same page... Look at the difference between the accounts highlighted in black and accounts highlighted in red. The ones in black are the known legitimate accounts, by known legitimate traders. see their percentage rewards allotted per their volume. I think in the highest case is like 2%. Now look at the proportion of rewards the ones highlighted in red were given versus how much volume they actually put in. sometimes 1400%. so you have Ultra Lisk putting in $100,000 of volume and farming 940, And then you have *fdsasfjbccfssgk* (sp?) who did $61 of volume and farmed $1.1 K. several examples on the same sheet
how's that even possible?
how's that even possible?
Oh damn I didn't even pick up on that i've definitely never gotten the same exact number multiple times in a row, have you guys?
Oh damn I didn't even pick up on that i've definitely never gotten the same exact number multiple times in a row, have you guys?
Same same brother all good, we're on the same page. The TLDR is they can farm the rewards but you can never fill their order yea? But wouldn't the time limit fix that, if they were constantly canceling orders? isn't there a time limit that if you're canceling and moving around orders that they take a longer amount of time until they start to accrue?
Same same brother all good, we're on the same page. The TLDR is they can farm the rewards but you can never fill their order yea? But wouldn't the time limit fix that, if they were constantly canceling orders? isn't there a time limit that if you're canceling and moving around orders that they take a longer amount of time until they start to accrue?
My bad I just saw you already answered that Modali
My bad I just saw you already answered that Modali
OK but why would that mean that they get them in batches? Why does ghost fill allow them to get several different disbursements of rewards at the same time?
OK but why would that mean that they get them in batches? Why does ghost fill allow them to get several different disbursements of rewards at the same time?
all different channels
all different channels
Ghost fills mentioned six different times just today
Ghost fills mentioned six different times just today
Is that how it works? I thought it just had to be a spread of 4 or less?
Is that how it works? I thought it just had to be a spread of 4 or less?
So this means that the prices will never go down to the .1 cent tick size? Must they be mutually exclusive? if that is the case, hard to imagine this allows you to *trade with less*. It only allows you to trade with less **compared to whole cent tick sizes**. it hurts bonders and MM's, anybody trading at the extremities who used to be getting .1c sizes. Maybe we compromise and keep $0.25 tick size to start the match/market, and then at the extremities still drop to .1?
So this means that the prices will never go down to the .1 cent tick size? Must they be mutually exclusive? if that is the case, hard to imagine this allows you to *trade with less*. It only allows you to trade with less **compared to whole cent tick sizes**. it hurts bonders and MM's, anybody trading at the extremities who used to be getting .1c sizes. Maybe we compromise and keep $0.25 tick size to start the match/market, and then at the extremities still drop to .1?
what do we think about the market is starting out @ .25 and then at the extremes going to .1 again? That would allow for bonding, and whatever it is they really want with going to .25. ("so that we are able to trade with less" sort of loses some of its credibility when it's in the same sentence with a fee increase of 66.7% <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251> )
what do we think about the market is starting out @ .25 and then at the extremes going to .1 again? That would allow for bonding, and whatever it is they really want with going to .25. ("so that we are able to trade with less" sort of loses some of its credibility when it's in the same sentence with a fee increase of 66.7% <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251> )