聊天记录
共 29 条,显示第 1-29 条
Yes, yesterday's rewards are impressive, considering the loss was only about $200 (including fee). But I looked further into the history—there were also a lot of trades in recent days, but the rewards were only $5-$25.
Yes, yesterday's rewards are impressive, considering the loss was only about $200 (including fee). But I looked further into the history—there were also a lot of trades in recent days, but the rewards were only $5-$25.
I'm not a programmer. That's why I'm asking where you got this information)
I'm not a programmer. That's why I'm asking where you got this information)
Where did you get the 10 millisecond figure? Did you measure it somehow? You wouldn't even have time to notice such rapid changes with your own eyes. LOL
Where did you get the 10 millisecond figure? Did you measure it somehow? You wouldn't even have time to notice such rapid changes with your own eyes. LOL
Have you seen his trading history? How can he keep buying and selling at huge losses if his orders can't be executed?
Have you seen his trading history? How can he keep buying and selling at huge losses if his orders can't be executed?
You're getting really confused.
At first, you wrote that he was going to execute orders. You described him as a representative of "ghost orders." Their orders are truly never executed, and they receive rewards without any risk.
But now you agree that his orders are often executed. How much reward he receives is his business—his liquidity is being used. What he sells at a loss—what difference does it make to you? It's his loss, that's the whole point of market making. Incidentally, it's immediately obvious that you've never made money from providing liquidity. Otherwise, you'd understand that he earns much less than you think.
The only thing I agree with is that there needs to be a minimum time in the order book for rewards to be awarded.
You're getting really confused.
At first, you wrote that he was going to execute orders. You described him as a representative of "ghost orders." Their orders are truly never executed, and they receive rewards without any risk.
But now you agree that his orders are often executed. How much reward he receives is his business—his liquidity is being used. What he sells at a loss—what difference does it make to you? It's his loss, that's the whole point of market making. Incidentally, it's immediately obvious that you've never made money from providing liquidity. Otherwise, you'd understand that he earns much less than you think.
The only thing I agree with is that there needs to be a minimum time in the order book for rewards to be awarded.
It's strange that the account you sent has many buy transactions. That means its liquidity is actually being used.
It's strange that the account you sent has many buy transactions. That means its liquidity is actually being used.
Yes, I and the whole world are conspiring against you lol.
Yes, I and the whole world are conspiring against you lol.
You can even try to move orders so quickly with your hands and see if you earn anything.
You can even try to move orders so quickly with your hands and see if you earn anything.
no
no
I think you're confusing them with "ghost orders." Those don't behave that way.
The bots in your video are unlikely to be receiving rewards. The reshuffling is too rapid.
I think you're confusing them with "ghost orders." Those don't behave that way.
The bots in your video are unlikely to be receiving rewards. The reshuffling is too rapid.
I still think the bot in the video simply crashed. It doesn't behave like the bots that make "ghost orders." But maybe I'm wrong.
I still think the bot in the video simply crashed. It doesn't behave like the bots that make "ghost orders." But maybe I'm wrong.
What do you plan to do about this? These bots provide liquidity. If you prevent them from moving it, they'll stop providing it altogether. How are you going to trade then?
P.S. I saw that some bot on yours simply crashed. It happens.
What do you plan to do about this? These bots provide liquidity. If you prevent them from moving it, they'll stop providing it altogether. How are you going to trade then?
P.S. I saw that some bot on yours simply crashed. It happens.
But your documentation says that's not the case—https://docs.polymarket.com/api-reference/geoblock
But your documentation says that's not the case—https://docs.polymarket.com/api-reference/geoblock
LMAO. They did exactly what you predicted. But this time, the rewards didn’t disappear right away after 5–20 minutes. They lasted for several hours. And then they vanished suddenly.
A lot of LP came in during those few hours. The spreads became absolutely minimal. There was real trading volume.
And now, everyone who didn’t manage to sell their positions before the rewards disappeared is stuck, since the order books are empty and there’s absolutely nowhere to sell.
Moreover, LPs often provided liquidity at prices that were far from fair. So now, not only are they unable to sell, but they’re also stuck with extremely unfavorable positions where prices are 20–50 cents higher than fair price.
<:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565>
LMAO. They did exactly what you predicted. But this time, the rewards didn’t disappear right away after 5–20 minutes. They lasted for several hours. And then they vanished suddenly.
A lot of LP came in during those few hours. The spreads became absolutely minimal. There was real trading volume.
And now, everyone who didn’t manage to sell their positions before the rewards disappeared is stuck, since the order books are empty and there’s absolutely nowhere to sell.
Moreover, LPs often provided liquidity at prices that were far from fair. So now, not only are they unable to sell, but they’re also stuck with extremely unfavorable positions where prices are 20–50 cents higher than fair price.
<:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565>
Please read the documentation carefully. If you're the only one having this problem, it means you're doing something wrong.
Please read the documentation carefully. If you're the only one having this problem, it means you're doing something wrong.
Oh, half the rewards are already gone. The rest will be gone in a couple of minutes.
<@1356604771208790198>
Oh, half the rewards are already gone. The rest will be gone in a couple of minutes.
<@1356604771208790198>
Take a look at the rewards in the screenshot. In about 10–20 minutes, the reward for all these markets will be just $10, with a minimum requirement of 50 shares.
And this is the case with virtually all new rewards that aren’t for the main World Cup outcomes.
Take a look at the rewards in the screenshot. In about 10–20 minutes, the reward for all these markets will be just $10, with a minimum requirement of 50 shares.
And this is the case with virtually all new rewards that aren’t for the main World Cup outcomes.
Another scam from Polymarket. They offer rewards of $100–$400 for just 20 shares. Then, 5–20 minutes later, they change the rewards to $10 for 50 shares. LMAO
Another scam from Polymarket. They offer rewards of $100–$400 for just 20 shares. Then, 5–20 minutes later, they change the rewards to $10 for 50 shares. LMAO
Tell your clueless developers that the website interface is a total mess
Tell your clueless developers that the website interface is a total mess
When is this damn site going to stop glitching?!! It takes several minutes for the interface to respond to order changes. I'm so sick of this. Bugs, bugs, endless bugs <:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565>
When is this damn site going to stop glitching?!! It takes several minutes for the interface to respond to order changes. I'm so sick of this. Bugs, bugs, endless bugs <:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565> <:scam:1479898552590270565>
Yes, it’s obviously just a formality. As I suspected, they clearly have an arrangement with a professional market maker. There was plenty of liquidity even without any incentives.
Yes, it’s obviously just a formality. As I suspected, they clearly have an arrangement with a professional market maker. There was plenty of liquidity even without any incentives.
1 million seems like a joke <:wow:1480174271589384212>
1 million seems like a joke <:wow:1480174271589384212>
The matches haven't been displayed for several hours
The matches haven't been displayed for several hours
I suspect they won’t.
Esports betting markets are back, but they’re not available for MLB or the NBA. Which is pretty strange, considering those are major sporting events. That said, there’s still liquidity there even without incentives. Maybe less than there used to be, but the order books are far from empty, unlike a month ago.
I think Polymarket has hired some professional market makers. This might be related to the news that Wintermute is entering the prediction markets 🤔
So it makes sense why there are incentives for esports—major market makers don’t want to deal with these markets.
But I really hope I’m wrong. We’ll find out soon enough, though. If the incentives don’t appear within 24 hours, it’s probably not worth waiting for them.
I suspect they won’t.
Esports betting markets are back, but they’re not available for MLB or the NBA. Which is pretty strange, considering those are major sporting events. That said, there’s still liquidity there even without incentives. Maybe less than there used to be, but the order books are far from empty, unlike a month ago.
I think Polymarket has hired some professional market makers. This might be related to the news that Wintermute is entering the prediction markets 🤔
So it makes sense why there are incentives for esports—major market makers don’t want to deal with these markets.
But I really hope I’m wrong. We’ll find out soon enough, though. If the incentives don’t appear within 24 hours, it’s probably not worth waiting for them.
Is there a separate thread for discussing PERP? What is that green bar that hasn't appeared on any other exchange?
Is there a separate thread for discussing PERP? What is that green bar that hasn't appeared on any other exchange?
"Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."
What kind of idiot came up with that phrase?
Are we creating a market to establish the truth, or is it actually something else?
"Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."
What kind of idiot came up with that phrase?
Are we creating a market to establish the truth, or is it actually something else?
The biggest sign of cowardice is the complete silence from the Polymarket team on this issue. It has already caused a huge stir on Twitter and in the media. The Polymarket team doesn't realize just how much damage this is doing to their reputation
The biggest sign of cowardice is the complete silence from the Polymarket team on this issue. It has already caused a huge stir on Twitter and in the media. The Polymarket team doesn't realize just how much damage this is doing to their reputation
I didn’t participate in the market everyone’s arguing about, but I’ll share my opinion.
Changing the rules after people have already started trading is terrible. That shouldn’t happen at all.
All rules should be clearly written so that such controversial situations don’t arise in the first place. If it’s impossible to write such clear rules for a particular event, it shouldn’t appear on the platform at all.
Unless the exchange establishes clear rules, these disputes will keep cropping up endlessly.
P.S. The situation with MicroStrategy is absolutely outrageous. How can you say “no” in a market where it’s a known fact that the event has already taken place? Based on rules that were changed at the last minute? It’s not even funny—it’s just nonsense.
I didn’t participate in the market everyone’s arguing about, but I’ll share my opinion.
Changing the rules after people have already started trading is terrible. That shouldn’t happen at all.
All rules should be clearly written so that such controversial situations don’t arise in the first place. If it’s impossible to write such clear rules for a particular event, it shouldn’t appear on the platform at all.
Unless the exchange establishes clear rules, these disputes will keep cropping up endlessly.
P.S. The situation with MicroStrategy is absolutely outrageous. How can you say “no” in a market where it’s a known fact that the event has already taken place? Based on rules that were changed at the last minute? It’s not even funny—it’s just nonsense.
Did you wake up at 6am to earn $1.04 in LP rewards while risking losses? <:wow:1480174271589384212>
Did you wake up at 6am to earn $1.04 in LP rewards while risking losses? <:wow:1480174271589384212>