KalshiI'm trying to make beer money with a $500 bankroll
I'm trying to make beer money with a $500 bankroll
betaclone参与话题 48消息总数 493
该用户的聊天记录定位。
聊天记录
共 493 条，显示第 101-150 条My strat requires me to update hundreds of single contract orders every second or it can't be profitable!
My strat requires me to update hundreds of single contract orders every second or it can't be profitable!
Lol
Lol
people never ask how many pennies are actually in front of that steamroller or how big of a shovel you have
people never ask how many pennies are actually in front of that steamroller or how big of a shovel you have
Not an insignificant one but still an edge case
Not an insignificant one but still an edge case
Seems like the only practical implication is order serialization. Haven't seen any remedy to that yet but also seems like a bit of an edge case
Seems like the only practical implication is order serialization. Haven't seen any remedy to that yet but also seems like a bit of an edge case
There is apparently a server side load to batch orders they don't want to deal with and it's probably best to start removing that functionality now
There is apparently a server side load to batch orders they don't want to deal with and it's probably best to start removing that functionality now
It's nothing to do with a specific VPS your code is just hammering the api past your rate limit
It's nothing to do with a specific VPS your code is just hammering the api past your rate limit
This sounds like a you problem
This sounds like a you problem
It's going to depend on where your server is too
It's going to depend on where your server is too
But I wouldn't be surprised if there were occaisionally latency issues. I just don't monitor those for latency
But I wouldn't be surprised if there were occaisionally latency issues. I just don't monitor those for latency
Not latency per se just some weird race behavior. Showing settlement updates while still showing open exposure. Stuff like that
Not latency per se just some weird race behavior. Showing settlement updates while still showing open exposure. Stuff like that
I think they're doing some work on them surrounding subaccounts
I think they're doing some work on them surrounding subaccounts
The balance endpoints have been a little wonky lately
The balance endpoints have been a little wonky lately
Don't know what this means
Don't know what this means
Wholesale api outages have become somewhat rare in recent months (I'm sure someone is going to contradict me on this immediately) so you sort of have to know where your pain points are and build tests around them
Wholesale api outages have become somewhat rare in recent months (I'm sure someone is going to contradict me on this immediately) so you sort of have to know where your pain points are and build tests around them
Good place to start: https://docs.kalshi.com/websockets/connection-keep-alive
Good place to start: https://docs.kalshi.com/websockets/connection-keep-alive
Seems pretty straightforward to me. Your rate tier gives you a write budget and that's how many orders you can send in a batch. Now if it is limiting orders below that limit which it sounds like it does then that'd a different issue entirely, but the language in the doc is clear
Seems pretty straightforward to me. Your rate tier gives you a write budget and that's how many orders you can send in a batch. Now if it is limiting orders below that limit which it sounds like it does then that'd a different issue entirely, but the language in the doc is clear
i mean i guess in the sense that it is asking the api to do something it doesn't currently do
i mean i guess in the sense that it is asking the api to do something it doesn't currently do
Not sure it could work with GTC orders. Although I'm not sure it could work with any orders
Not sure it could work with GTC orders. Although I'm not sure it could work with any orders
But if there were 50 contracts available at a best buy of 0.8500 it would fill those and then cancel (assuming IOC)
But if there were 50 contracts available at a best buy of 0.8500 it would fill those and then cancel (assuming IOC)
Ideally. Say in the above scenario by the time the order reaches the engine the best buy is 0.6000 then it would simply cancel with no fills
Ideally. Say in the above scenario by the time the order reaches the engine the best buy is 0.6000 then it would simply cancel with no fills
so say you send a limit order for 100 buys at 0.9900 and a min price of 0.8500 as long as the best buy price was between 85-99 it would fill what it could. the more i draw it out the more complicated it sounds...
so say you send a limit order for 100 buys at 0.9900 and a min price of 0.8500 as long as the best buy price was between 85-99 it would fill what it could. the more i draw it out the more complicated it sounds...
just spitballing but my imagined behavior would be it would fill whatever it could between the minimum and limit price
just spitballing but my imagined behavior would be it would fill whatever it could between the minimum and limit price
This was before they could even touch sports
This was before they could even touch sports
I found Kalshi because in the early days they were hammering the marketing for the weather markets and I thought it was hilarious. Then I found the fin markets
I found Kalshi because in the early days they were hammering the marketing for the weather markets and I thought it was hilarious. Then I found the fin markets
OK so temp some guy parks his cyber truck somewhere and it reflects on a sensor for 5 seconds and raises the avg temp a thousandth of a degree
OK so temp some guy parks his cyber truck somewhere and it reflects on a sensor for 5 seconds and raises the avg temp a thousandth of a degree
There are still rainfall markets aren't there?
There are still rainfall markets aren't there?
I just can't get over the part where there's a cup in Central Park and if a leaf drips a little water into it you lose
I just can't get over the part where there's a cup in Central Park and if a leaf drips a little water into it you lose
It's funny though weather markets are probably the closest to crypto/fin markets as far as being able to build prob models for algo trading. I've read some good papers on it
It's funny though weather markets are probably the closest to crypto/fin markets as far as being able to build prob models for algo trading. I've read some good papers on it
Weather markets trip me out. One extra rain drop in one spot...
Weather markets trip me out. One extra rain drop in one spot...
This happened yesterday: thats as weird as it gets
This happened yesterday: thats as weird as it gets
Even if it was on the dollar
Even if it was on the dollar
Although it still wouldn't matter if they didn't it would be such an ansane black swan for it to land right there
Although it still wouldn't matter if they didn't it would be such an ansane black swan for it to land right there
Yeah they define the strikes for hourlies at 99c
Yeah they define the strikes for hourlies at 99c
I'm always thinking in terms of crypto/fin. It would just never come up
I'm always thinking in terms of crypto/fin. It would just never come up
But I would have to assume by that logic it would be inclusive
But I would have to assume by that logic it would be inclusive
Surprised that's how the weather markets work. Reason why over under on sports are to the half point
Surprised that's how the weather markets work. Reason why over under on sports are to the half point
Guess that's a fair question for the 1 in a billion shot it happens. But this past month I've seen some real nail biters
Guess that's a fair question for the 1 in a billion shot it happens. But this past month I've seen some real nail biters
Are you asking if it includes if the price lands precisely on one of those strikes?
Are you asking if it includes if the price lands precisely on one of those strikes?
It means it is between the floor and cap strikes
It means it is between the floor and cap strikes
Like I said, it's niche. But I can imagine other applications for sending a min and max price on an order potentially
Like I said, it's niche. But I can imagine other applications for sending a min and max price on an order potentially
Basically I have some strats that bypass my probability engines and rely on market implied probabilities very close to expiration. These can move quickly with small underlying price movements to the point where a flagged trade at say 90c can have dropped to under 50c in the ms it takes to form and send the order payload and I want to avoid that scenario I've built a gate that does a quick order book ladder check right before actually sending the order to see if conditions are still favorable but it adds a bit of latency to the order process
Basically I have some strats that bypass my probability engines and rely on market implied probabilities very close to expiration. These can move quickly with small underlying price movements to the point where a flagged trade at say 90c can have dropped to under 50c in the ms it takes to form and send the order payload and I want to avoid that scenario I've built a gate that does a quick order book ladder check right before actually sending the order to see if conditions are still favorable but it adds a bit of latency to the order process
Also realize this might be such a niche use case it wouldn't be worth the effort
Also realize this might be such a niche use case it wouldn't be worth the effort
<@1294044400065839177> this might be completely impractical given the inner workings of the matching engine, but would it be possible to include a minimum price parameter on orders to put a floor on where it can fill?
<@1294044400065839177> this might be completely impractical given the inner workings of the matching engine, but would it be possible to include a minimum price parameter on orders to put a floor on where it can fill?
we are not normal
we are not normal
well they have been transparent that the main concern with the web UI is the casual user and i'd imagine even a heavy "normal" user has never experienced anything they';d recognize as a problem with the UI
well they have been transparent that the main concern with the web UI is the casual user and i'd imagine even a heavy "normal" user has never experienced anything they';d recognize as a problem with the UI
Claude!
Claude!
so, laziness
so, laziness
when most people gripe about building their own UI's it seems to stem ultimately from the fact that they're not actually tracking/logging their own trades and just want kalshi to do all of it. then they're surprised when the kalshi UI doesn't offer them unlimited customization
when most people gripe about building their own UI's it seems to stem ultimately from the fact that they're not actually tracking/logging their own trades and just want kalshi to do all of it. then they're surprised when the kalshi UI doesn't offer them unlimited customization