<@1272383282687905939> sports rewards are messed up. The new tennis markets have $3.5 and new soccer is $0.8
<@1272383282687905939> sports rewards are messed up. The new tennis markets have $3.5 and new soccer is $0.8
2026-07-22 · Polymarket · 61 条相关讨论
<@1272383282687905939> sports rewards are messed up. The new tennis markets have $3.5 and new soccer is $0.8
<@1272383282687905939> sports rewards are messed up. The new tennis markets have $3.5 and new soccer is $0.8
if soccer is 80 cents it's not even worth my time, I am serious. with the website checks I can't even automate it
if soccer is 80 cents it's not even worth my time, I am serious. with the website checks I can't even automate it
Must be a bug I don't see why tennis would go up
Must be a bug I don't see why tennis would go up
tennis proposing is one of the riskiest ones tbh
tennis proposing is one of the riskiest ones tbh
Esports is worth 80 cent?
Esports is worth 80 cent?
for anything manual I bet the serious proposers quit if it's 80 cents
for anything manual I bet the serious proposers quit if it's 80 cents
who said that <:angrydog:959193405328621568>
who said that <:angrydog:959193405328621568>
We have a new rewards system for proposing, based upon the UMA teams recommendations.
We have a new rewards system for proposing, based upon the UMA teams recommendations.
Tennis is the only one that can be automated and it's worth 4x the proposals in soccer and esports that are manual only 🤡
Tennis is the only one that can be automated and it's worth 4x the proposals in soccer and esports that are manual only 🤡
How is tennis risky? It's people rushing that makes it risky
How is tennis risky? It's people rushing that makes it risky
make tennis 80 cents and there will never be another dispute
make tennis 80 cents and there will never be another dispute
because nobody will rush it
because nobody will rush it
ye idk, I just saw a lot of people fucking it up
ye idk, I just saw a lot of people fucking it up
everyone will wait 5 minutes to propose
everyone will wait 5 minutes to propose
well this is wrong, making tennis higher encourages more mistakes and more disputes
well this is wrong, making tennis higher encourages more mistakes and more disputes
I don't see how tennis is worth so much more when that's easy
I don't see how tennis is worth so much more when that's easy
Tennis is the only one that can be run unattended, automated
Tennis is the only one that can be run unattended, automated
oh look, another tennis dispute, let's reward these people more for doing a shitty job
oh look, another tennis dispute, let's reward these people more for doing a shitty job
They cut rewards for soccer 60% because nobody fucks up
They cut rewards for soccer 60% because nobody fucks up
So they think it's easy
So they think it's easy
In terms of time spent it's much higher than tennis
In terms of time spent it's much higher than tennis
Hopefully all your stuff gets proposed. Not enough people with capital like me, and I'm no longer going to spend all day doing this
Hopefully all your stuff gets proposed. Not enough people with capital like me, and I'm no longer going to spend all day doing this
I have a life to live
I have a life to live
Change the proposal reward for sports events back to $2. An $0.80 reward is ridiculously low, especially considering that sports generate some of the highest revenue on the platform. People lose $750 if something is wrong. You are not giving them any free money.
Change the proposal reward for sports events back to $2. An $0.80 reward is ridiculously low, especially considering that sports generate some of the highest revenue on the platform. People lose $750 if something is wrong. You are not giving them any free money.
Change the proposal reward for sports events back to $2. $0.80 is ridiculously low, especially considering that sports generate some of the highest revenue on the platform. People lose $750 if something is wrong. You are not giving them any free money.
Change the proposal reward for sports events back to $2. $0.80 is ridiculously low, especially considering that sports generate some of the highest revenue on the platform. People lose $750 if something is wrong. You are not giving them any free money.
delete, dont give them ideas
delete, dont give them ideas
uma team recommended this change
uma team recommended this change
april fools was a few months ago. funny joke. $500 for $0.6 is wild
april fools was a few months ago. funny joke. $500 for $0.6 is wild
bonds should be $250 for those
bonds should be $250 for those
Are you guys seriously trying to save $10k a day which can potentially delay the resolution for like 90% of the sports market? Have you ever considered checking the PNL of an average UMA proposer? or just the top ones and thought to nerf it all?
Are you guys seriously trying to save $10k a day which can potentially delay the resolution for like 90% of the sports market? Have you ever considered checking the PNL of an average UMA proposer? or just the top ones and thought to nerf it all?
This doesn't seem to be the case. Or at least, RL announced the new values in UMA Discord and the lowest is 500. (Unless I read things wrong or missed something.)
This doesn't seem to be the case. Or at least, RL announced the new values in UMA Discord and the lowest is 500. (Unless I read things wrong or missed something.)
you just need 833 correct proposals to make it back if you do one wrong
you just need 833 correct proposals to make it back if you do one wrong
excited to look forward for markets being settled a week later to redeem 🙂
excited to look forward for markets being settled a week later to redeem 🙂
I am not proposing for less than 2$ on any section, you with your bots can have it
I am not proposing for less than 2$ on any section, you with your bots can have it
$0.8 is really a joke. Don't be surprised if a bunch of sports markets stay unproposed for a while
$0.8 is really a joke. Don't be surprised if a bunch of sports markets stay unproposed for a while
?? This doesn’t make sense. They don’t get the rewards, and in fact, they make less per dispute now
?? This doesn’t make sense. They don’t get the rewards, and in fact, they make less per dispute now
It's not about reducing the reward to a specific number, a specific number may be UMA team's idea. But lowering the overall reward and cutting cost shouldn't be theirs. We should not play the word games here.
It's not about reducing the reward to a specific number, a specific number may be UMA team's idea. But lowering the overall reward and cutting cost shouldn't be theirs. We should not play the word games here.
Let me be very clear: 800 out of roughly 2,000 wallets with at least one proposal are currently operating at a loss. Almost nobody is making significant money except the top two or three proposers, and even they regularly take major losses when their proposals are disputed. A reward of $0.60 or $0.80 is ridiculous when a single incorrect proposal can cost someone $750. Crypto proposers pay 35-40 cent gas on each proposal now to get 0.6$. Mentions markets are often ambiguous, and geopolitics markets carry the same level of uncertainty. The reward is completely disproportionate to the financial risk proposers are taking. Best to do the right thing and change it back to $2 and $5. People do lose if they're wrong. $10-20k a day won't hurt to get everything proposed on time. You can see how people struggle to get their markets proposed in channels all the day and if you offer 80 cent for a single proposal. I don't know what will happen. Its good not to risk to save to 10k$ a day which can potentially delay a LOT of proposals.
Let me be very clear: 800 out of roughly 2,000 wallets with at least one proposal are currently operating at a loss. Almost nobody is making significant money except the top two or three proposers, and even they regularly take major losses when their proposals are disputed. A reward of $0.60 or $0.80 is ridiculous when a single incorrect proposal can cost someone $750. Crypto proposers pay 35-40 cent gas on each proposal now to get 0.6$. Mentions markets are often ambiguous, and geopolitics markets carry the same level of uncertainty. The reward is completely disproportionate to the financial risk proposers are taking. Best to do the right thing and change it back to $2 and $5. People do lose if they're wrong. $10-20k a day won't hurt to get everything proposed on time. You can see how people struggle to get their markets proposed in channels all the day and if you offer 80 cent for a single proposal. I don't know what will happen. Its good not to risk to save to 10k$ a day which can potentially delay a LOT of proposals.
cutting by 70% is far fetched and came way left field
cutting by 70% is far fetched and came way left field
We should start a strike. <@1276557789996515411> <@254253101358383105> <@305760786704236554> and all the others from top 10 Let these admins work for pennies.
We should start a strike. <@1276557789996515411> <@254253101358383105> <@305760786704236554> and all the others from top 10 Let these admins work for pennies.
<@1361217824776786031> saying it's UMA when they're just trying save money, like cutting LP rewards, cutting maker rebates and increasing sport fees 🤡 Always doing stuff without any notice, trying to scam users, such a clown
<@1361217824776786031> saying it's UMA when they're just trying save money, like cutting LP rewards, cutting maker rebates and increasing sport fees 🤡 Always doing stuff without any notice, trying to scam users, such a clown
should be reverted a huge number of markets will simply hang without being proposed $0.60/$0.80 reward is a joke
should be reverted a huge number of markets will simply hang without being proposed $0.60/$0.80 reward is a joke
Would be nice but won't work there are a few hundred people to convince.
Would be nice but won't work there are a few hundred people to convince.
Oh it’ll work. You know how much capital it takes to resolve these? The small guys will take weeks with 2hr liveness
Oh it’ll work. You know how much capital it takes to resolve these? The small guys will take weeks with 2hr liveness
Besides flame, which I haven't contacted yet, most of the top proposers are on board
Besides flame, which I haven't contacted yet, most of the top proposers are on board
Kudos to you if you pull it off lol
Kudos to you if you pull it off lol
<@194561713033445376> will you be willing to join a proposers strike, if they keep lowering the rewards to pennies?
<@194561713033445376> will you be willing to join a proposers strike, if they keep lowering the rewards to pennies?
should also be reverted for esports, it's a very tricky stuff to propose we need to deal with trash like this on a daily basis (yesterday's case, OFFICIAL resolution source on the left)
should also be reverted for esports, it's a very tricky stuff to propose we need to deal with trash like this on a daily basis (yesterday's case, OFFICIAL resolution source on the left)
everyone talking just has insane bag bias, <@1361217824776786031> if you want a real unbiased opinion dm me
everyone talking just has insane bag bias, <@1361217824776786031> if you want a real unbiased opinion dm me
So you still gonna propose for pennies
So you still gonna propose for pennies
I mean at least he stays in character
I mean at least he stays in character
That woke you up! You've been quiet since May. How's it going?
That woke you up! You've been quiet since May. How's it going?
I like how you don't understand how uma's bond + final fee works. And that you didn't ask uma to lower the egregiously high final fee element disputers post 500 to win 125 now, that's awful
I like how you don't understand how uma's bond + final fee works. And that you didn't ask uma to lower the egregiously high final fee element disputers post 500 to win 125 now, that's awful
I never said that, it will balance itself out. If markets are truly getting stuck im sure they would adjust or resolve it themselves. Ya'll are obsessed with me for some reason, I have way more important things on kalshi to worry about than UMA proposals and have already taken a big step back
I never said that, it will balance itself out. If markets are truly getting stuck im sure they would adjust or resolve it themselves. Ya'll are obsessed with me for some reason, I have way more important things on kalshi to worry about than UMA proposals and have already taken a big step back
Right, that's why you spent 2 weeks doing contract upgrades at 4 AM, because uma proposals aren't important to you
Right, that's why you spent 2 weeks doing contract upgrades at 4 AM, because uma proposals aren't important to you
There seems to be a problem with the proposal rewards. They're all about 70% less than yesterday. Surely this is a bug? https://explorer.uma.xyz/?status=request_open&date_field=proposal_block_time&sort_by=request_time&sort_order=desc&page=1&page_size=100&group_neg_risk=true
There seems to be a problem with the proposal rewards. They're all about 70% less than yesterday. Surely this is a bug? https://explorer.uma.xyz/?status=request_open&date_field=proposal_block_time&sort_by=request_time&sort_order=desc&page=1&page_size=100&group_neg_risk=true
how about just ditch fucking uma polymarket
how about just ditch fucking uma polymarket
you guys propose on yourself then. Many will not do this stuff for your resolution. From 5 to 2, and now from 2-0.6/0.8 you guys can do this proposals stuff then. are you building loyal proposer base or uma. Tomorrow uma will say they want to remove proposers and deploy their bots will you also entertain that. Long term vision in resolving proposal is missing for saving few thousand dollars.
you guys propose on yourself then. Many will not do this stuff for your resolution. From 5 to 2, and now from 2-0.6/0.8 you guys can do this proposals stuff then. are you building loyal proposer base or uma. Tomorrow uma will say they want to remove proposers and deploy their bots will you also entertain that. Long term vision in resolving proposal is missing for saving few thousand dollars.
They reduced sports to 80 cents lol where dispute happens everyday lol
They reduced sports to 80 cents lol where dispute happens everyday lol
"Disputes happen every day", but they're 100x less common on Sports markets, so the 60c doesn't make sense.
"Disputes happen every day", but they're 100x less common on Sports markets, so the 60c doesn't make sense.
<@1361217824776786031> <@624575779023355904> <@1402701322775695391> <@707597210845446214> This new change with proposal rewards seems like punishing the proposers for doing a good job. 80 cents for sports is not worth the time that needs to be put in for proposing. It's not like proposers don't have anything on the line. it takes a lot of money to propose. The people who would be willing to do this work for 80c usually don't have the money needed to propose markets. And everyone fucks up once in a while. It would take 375 proposals to break even previously. With the new changes it'll take 625 proposals to recover from a bad proposal. It's not worth the risk or time.
<@1361217824776786031> <@624575779023355904> <@1402701322775695391> <@707597210845446214> This new change with proposal rewards seems like punishing the proposers for doing a good job. 80 cents for sports is not worth the time that needs to be put in for proposing. It's not like proposers don't have anything on the line. it takes a lot of money to propose. The people who would be willing to do this work for 80c usually don't have the money needed to propose markets. And everyone fucks up once in a while. It would take 375 proposals to break even previously. With the new changes it'll take 625 proposals to recover from a bad proposal. It's not worth the risk or time.