秋田预测市场 · Discord 审计

体育市场taker fee涨至5%引发用户出走潮

2026-07-10 · Polymarket · 242 条相关讨论

oluwasolana 2026-07-09 22:01:54

I just pray that outcome get more market makers and i moved there straight, polymarket is so ass rn, if you are going to reduce the spreads, reduce the fucking fees on sports too

I just pray that outcome get more market makers and i moved there straight, polymarket is so ass rn, if you are going to reduce the spreads, reduce the fucking fees on sports too

DjBarry 2026-07-10 09:11:10

Bruh the fees make the odds worse than in online casinos

Bruh the fees make the odds worse than in online casinos

dukaking 2026-07-10 09:11:31

lmfao ya up to 5% fee on Sports

lmfao ya up to 5% fee on Sports

forehead 2026-07-10 09:13:44

they gutted the maker rebate too on sports?

they gutted the maker rebate too on sports?

blunkoed 2026-07-10 09:22:07

Please make crypto fees higher <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>

Please make crypto fees higher <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:23:53

5% are they serious

5% are they serious

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:24:03

More rake is better

More rake is better

Ryan 2026-07-10 09:24:52

YAYYY MORE JEWISH FEES

YAYYY MORE JEWISH FEES

2026-07-10 09:25:04

Polymorefees

Polymorefees

The Dude 2026-07-10 09:25:41

pretty sure it's gonna be miscalced

pretty sure it's gonna be miscalced

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:25:48

And in 2027 Q1 up to 15

And in 2027 Q1 up to 15

Ryan 2026-07-10 09:28:50

JUST GIVE EVERY SPORTS MARKET .10¢ TICKS TO TIGHTEN SPREADS, IT'S NOT HARD

JUST GIVE EVERY SPORTS MARKET .10¢ TICKS TO TIGHTEN SPREADS, IT'S NOT HARD

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:35:33

Truly 0% on the makers and 5% on the takers, this is something very significant. As usual in this kind of market, the very rich have their say, and the lowly workers like us are exploited like common peasants in the Middle Ages.

Truly 0% on the makers and 5% on the takers, this is something very significant. As usual in this kind of market, the very rich have their say, and the lowly workers like us are exploited like common peasants in the Middle Ages.

Chonpa 2026-07-10 09:37:35

So with 5% fee Polymarket become worse then random sportsbook crypto casino

So with 5% fee Polymarket become worse then random sportsbook crypto casino

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:37:51

it's only good for market makers now

it's only good for market makers now

yueying 2026-07-10 09:38:02

With no referral rewards all takers will die soon, only taker rebates will not cover the loss

With no referral rewards all takers will die soon, only taker rebates will not cover the loss

Neftimate 2026-07-10 09:39:09

the new sports fee is so dumb. Volume is gonna drop and they’ll make way less than before

the new sports fee is so dumb. Volume is gonna drop and they’ll make way less than before

Chonpa 2026-07-10 09:40:07

So why would i bet now on Poly exactly?

So why would i bet now on Poly exactly?

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:40:09

I don't know if the guys running Polymarket have *any* knowledge of the market, or if they have a stake with the market makers.

I don't know if the guys running Polymarket have *any* knowledge of the market, or if they have a stake with the market makers.

Ryan 2026-07-10 09:42:32

I can't wait for NoVigs pm to release

I can't wait for NoVigs pm to release

Ryan 2026-07-10 09:44:22

Remember when polymarket had zero fees and the best odds in the world

Remember when polymarket had zero fees and the best odds in the world

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 09:44:30

u dont understabnd gamble

u dont understabnd gamble

TeenyTinySharpe 2026-07-10 09:49:36

So I'm just thinking - with this fee bieng raised for sports thing, if it makes sense to include esports in that?

So I'm just thinking - with this fee bieng raised for sports thing, if it makes sense to include esports in that?

TeenyTinySharpe 2026-07-10 09:49:43

like - this is an only just getting going business

like - this is an only just getting going business

TeenyTinySharpe 2026-07-10 09:49:57

would be nice to keep fees down for a little bit while things have momentum?

would be nice to keep fees down for a little bit while things have momentum?

Vivian 2026-07-10 09:52:16

If you don’t pay it out soon, I’m going to kill myself. All my money has gone to fees.

If you don’t pay it out soon, I’m going to kill myself. All my money has gone to fees.

Ryan 2026-07-10 09:57:00

Will Polymarket stop jewing their customers and reduce fees

Will Polymarket stop jewing their customers and reduce fees

Chapo 2026-07-10 10:08:19

they also lowered the maker rebate percentage on sports 😄

they also lowered the maker rebate percentage on sports 😄

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 10:08:21

"fees increased"

"fees increased"

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 10:11:01

this kills most taker strategies so sports markets now are purely retail flow i guess, back to casino vig odds

this kills most taker strategies so sports markets now are purely retail flow i guess, back to casino vig odds

VeryLucky888 2026-07-10 10:20:49

Really guys?? Not even going to mention that youre lowering maker rebates in your announcement. Just let us read that in the T&Cs?

Really guys?? Not even going to mention that youre lowering maker rebates in your announcement. Just let us read that in the T&Cs?

dnobel22 2026-07-10 10:20:58

guys you should really stop updating fees without first notifying ppl in here. thats my suggestion

guys you should really stop updating fees without first notifying ppl in here. thats my suggestion

dnobel22 2026-07-10 10:22:04

i havent seen if the 0.05 sports taker fee change is live yet or just only in docs.. but finding out about it from a random ass X account is.. <:wtf:1000341643926458418> not expected from a however many tens of billions of dollars company <:pepecry:1480174599093096560>

i havent seen if the 0.05 sports taker fee change is live yet or just only in docs.. but finding out about it from a random ass X account is.. <:wtf:1000341643926458418> not expected from a however many tens of billions of dollars company <:pepecry:1480174599093096560>

rafael 2026-07-10 10:27:13

I agree 100%, they should also increase the maker rebates AND the category weight of sports to align with the other markets too

I agree 100%, they should also increase the maker rebates AND the category weight of sports to align with the other markets too

RochNRoad 2026-07-10 10:31:38

The tick change reduces makers profitability, and then the fee change reduces taker profitability. You guys reduced the maker percentage but didn't mention that, so everyone is clear, makers receive the same rebate while takers pay more. IDK, just seems like if you are in a volume war, this is a bad move. One problem that i think exists is that price discovery can't happen because it is literally so expensive to take, the reduction in tick size was a nice help for that, but then the added taker fees kind of negates that.

The tick change reduces makers profitability, and then the fee change reduces taker profitability. You guys reduced the maker percentage but didn't mention that, so everyone is clear, makers receive the same rebate while takers pay more. IDK, just seems like if you are in a volume war, this is a bad move. One problem that i think exists is that price discovery can't happen because it is literally so expensive to take, the reduction in tick size was a nice help for that, but then the added taker fees kind of negates that.

alex 2026-07-10 10:32:09

So not only did they increase the fee by 67%, they also reduced the maker reward by 67% on top

So not only did they increase the fee by 67%, they also reduced the maker reward by 67% on top

RochNRoad 2026-07-10 10:32:56

We went to quarter ticks, but at ~0.50 you added half a cent in taker fees, the net of that is less price discovery. Also with the added fees, you don't get any additional routing from smart routers to your exchange, even if you are 1 or 2 ticks better than others.

We went to quarter ticks, but at ~0.50 you added half a cent in taker fees, the net of that is less price discovery. Also with the added fees, you don't get any additional routing from smart routers to your exchange, even if you are 1 or 2 ticks better than others.

alex 2026-07-10 10:34:17

So on 100 shares at 0.50$ Before it was: 0,75 fees - 25% maker = 0,5625$ net fees (before maker program) Now it's 1,25 fees - 15% maker = 1,0625$ so exactly 0.50$ more than before

So on 100 shares at 0.50$ Before it was: 0,75 fees - 25% maker = 0,5625$ net fees (before maker program) Now it's 1,25 fees - 15% maker = 1,0625$ so exactly 0.50$ more than before

Duratio 2026-07-10 10:37:20

We have to be maker in the future, no more takers

We have to be maker in the future, no more takers

TeenyTinySharpe 2026-07-10 10:38:28

agreed. Liquidity rewards are just wasting poly money rn - useless

agreed. Liquidity rewards are just wasting poly money rn - useless

izhbozh 2026-07-10 10:39:56

its so dumb

its so dumb

izhbozh 2026-07-10 10:40:16

quarter tick sizes, up fees, lower rebates, basically all at once

quarter tick sizes, up fees, lower rebates, basically all at once

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:46:39

I mean making volumes would be done by being legal in more than 3 countries on the whole planet

I mean making volumes would be done by being legal in more than 3 countries on the whole planet

Failed_state 2026-07-10 10:47:38

Giving 3 hours notice for fee changes is insane. A company should not be making announcements like this .Give people a few days minimum to digest changes and modify their bots etc

Giving 3 hours notice for fee changes is insane. A company should not be making announcements like this .Give people a few days minimum to digest changes and modify their bots etc

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:47:53

They're getting to Kalshi level fees while nobody can use the platform, API or website

They're getting to Kalshi level fees while nobody can use the platform, API or website

blunkoed 2026-07-10 10:49:02

shame on you guys

shame on you guys

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 10:49:39

yep true but they are mega jews so nothing will get reverted

yep true but they are mega jews so nothing will get reverted

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 10:49:51

it costs more to take than you will make with your taker edge

it costs more to take than you will make with your taker edge

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:51:35

Also lowering maker rebates without announcing it is fucked

Also lowering maker rebates without announcing it is fucked

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:51:42

Like you make an announcement

Like you make an announcement

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:53:54

They do everything the wrong way, happy to be porting everything towards the green platform

They do everything the wrong way, happy to be porting everything towards the green platform

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:54:11

Like Kalshi has same fees now almost with 5ms P99 and more retail flow

Like Kalshi has same fees now almost with 5ms P99 and more retail flow

The Dude 2026-07-10 10:54:19

Why stay here lmao

Why stay here lmao

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 10:54:38

imagine the average trader

imagine the average trader

blunkoed 2026-07-10 10:55:02

They know most ppl can’t go kalshi

They know most ppl can’t go kalshi

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 10:55:10

taker fees nearing casino vig maker fees nerfed

taker fees nearing casino vig maker fees nerfed

Michael Markout 2026-07-10 11:02:11

i think fees still arent high enough - they should be at least doubled again

i think fees still arent high enough - they should be at least doubled again

Nanamo613 2026-07-10 11:03:24

Why do they reduce the maker rewards now

Why do they reduce the maker rewards now

odogg3333 2026-07-10 11:09:52

if everybody is making who is gonna take?

if everybody is making who is gonna take?

odogg3333 2026-07-10 11:09:58

have polymarket considered this

have polymarket considered this

The Dude 2026-07-10 11:11:55

They just want to milk the cows while they can, I dont think there's a long term vision other than on PM US tbh

They just want to milk the cows while they can, I dont think there's a long term vision other than on PM US tbh

nochill 2026-07-10 11:18:00

how do you think they get paid 😭

how do you think they get paid 😭

perfect 2026-07-10 11:20:52

poly want to make alot of money with wc finals coming up, so obvious

poly want to make alot of money with wc finals coming up, so obvious

masterjoess 2026-07-10 11:22:21

Tell users that 0.25 tick brings down what it actually costs, and then raise the sports fee to 0.05. <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>

Tell users that 0.25 tick brings down what it actually costs, and then raise the sports fee to 0.05. <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>

next_step 2026-07-10 11:37:28

At this rate the vig is similar to a sportsbook.

At this rate the vig is similar to a sportsbook.

next_step 2026-07-10 11:43:40

No wonder the green platform is winning. They don’t blind side users with 67% increase in fees on their biggest category, set to start in less than 3 hours after the announcement.

No wonder the green platform is winning. They don’t blind side users with 67% increase in fees on their biggest category, set to start in less than 3 hours after the announcement.

Neftimate 2026-07-10 11:47:51

This is a huge fumble by Polymarket. The only reason Polymarket was better than "the green platform" was lower fees. Now they're similar. Polymarket will revert to lower fees when they see their market share decline over the next two months. The unfortunate part is that users who leave may not come back

This is a huge fumble by Polymarket. The only reason Polymarket was better than "the green platform" was lower fees. Now they're similar. Polymarket will revert to lower fees when they see their market share decline over the next two months. The unfortunate part is that users who leave may not come back

next_step 2026-07-10 11:50:13

Polymarket Volume by Month: March - 10.5 billion April - 9 billion May - 7 billion Then they got saved by the World Cup a bit in June. They will continue to hemorrhage volume and market share with these crazy fees. Kalshi users are mostly rec and are way less sensitive to fees. There is no way PM doesn’t continue this downward march with these continued fee increases.

Polymarket Volume by Month: March - 10.5 billion April - 9 billion May - 7 billion Then they got saved by the World Cup a bit in June. They will continue to hemorrhage volume and market share with these crazy fees. Kalshi users are mostly rec and are way less sensitive to fees. There is no way PM doesn’t continue this downward march with these continued fee increases.

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 11:51:53

People working for Kalshi have infiltrated Polymarket to sabotage them.

People working for Kalshi have infiltrated Polymarket to sabotage them.

Chien mechant 2026-07-10 12:05:33

Yeah I just checked it damn

Yeah I just checked it damn

LostGorilla 2026-07-10 12:06:08

Getting to be pure greed now. Claude tokens must be costing them too much

Getting to be pure greed now. Claude tokens must be costing them too much

Cracker 2026-07-10 12:11:46

whos making these decisions with absolutely 0 consulting of paltform users

whos making these decisions with absolutely 0 consulting of paltform users

Auro 2026-07-10 12:12:57

No one asked for any of these changes

No one asked for any of these changes

033033033 2026-07-10 12:14:15

Idk why they dont actually speak to users of the platform before making these decisions. Imagine increasing fees, decreasing maker rebate, and adding 0.25c ticks at the same time 😂

Idk why they dont actually speak to users of the platform before making these decisions. Imagine increasing fees, decreasing maker rebate, and adding 0.25c ticks at the same time 😂

Auro 2026-07-10 12:15:37

3 hour notice on maintenance, corporate standard is at least 24 hrs

3 hour notice on maintenance, corporate standard is at least 24 hrs

berboche 2026-07-10 12:16:12

"Starting Friday at 12:01 AM ET, the sports fee coefficient moves to 0.05, aligning sports with our other categories. More on fees:" does that mean theres more fees or less fees than before

"Starting Friday at 12:01 AM ET, the sports fee coefficient moves to 0.05, aligning sports with our other categories. More on fees:" does that mean theres more fees or less fees than before

033033033 2026-07-10 12:16:58

More fees + maker rebate decreasing from 25% to 15%. Enjoy!

More fees + maker rebate decreasing from 25% to 15%. Enjoy!

Engr_shahzaib. 2026-07-10 12:18:32

fee increased on sports markets and rebate decreased?

fee increased on sports markets and rebate decreased?

Rainless 2026-07-10 12:20:28

??????????????

??????????????

FinGeek (FoG) 2026-07-10 12:22:13

More fees is always good they can hire more devs to fix their site

More fees is always good they can hire more devs to fix their site

tsmultra 2026-07-10 12:24:44

Yes, the fees coefficient changed to 0.05 for the sports market, effective July 10 (ET)

Yes, the fees coefficient changed to 0.05 for the sports market, effective July 10 (ET)

033033033 2026-07-10 12:29:51

It's funny how this is a unanimous opinion among regular users and they decide to do it anyway

It's funny how this is a unanimous opinion among regular users and they decide to do it anyway

Vini 2026-07-10 12:30:22

i mean for sports maybe its not that bad but for other markets?

i mean for sports maybe its not that bad but for other markets?

Laccs 2026-07-10 12:32:44

The extra fees are a bit crazy though 😵‍💫

The extra fees are a bit crazy though 😵‍💫

izhbozh 2026-07-10 12:36:33

how long until they start charging maker fees lmao

how long until they start charging maker fees lmao

izhbozh 2026-07-10 12:40:35

do institutions get better fees?

do institutions get better fees?

flipadria 2026-07-10 13:15:27

Will fees be raised again before September

Will fees be raised again before September

Sterling 2026-07-10 13:42:26

"to increase liquidity" lmao that statement has got to be the most out of touch if they're not reading the state of the ob with their own damn eyes

"to increase liquidity" lmao that statement has got to be the most out of touch if they're not reading the state of the ob with their own damn eyes

033033033 2026-07-10 13:43:07

Hahaha its like none of them have ever actually interacted with the site at all

Hahaha its like none of them have ever actually interacted with the site at all

Samwise Gamgee 2026-07-10 13:57:55

Taker fees are up to 10% now.. thats so much worse than asian bookies

Taker fees are up to 10% now.. thats so much worse than asian bookies

PUMPA 2026-07-10 13:59:40

they only know how to raise fees, nothing else

they only know how to raise fees, nothing else

PUMPA 2026-07-10 13:59:55

why build a successful product when you can just raise fees?

why build a successful product when you can just raise fees?

PUMPA 2026-07-10 14:00:02

circus

circus

VeryLucky888 2026-07-10 14:00:26

I think realistically it’s because they’re raising fees, so this way market makers rebates don’t go up per share (rebates are a proportion of fees). My frustration is that it’s not being clearly communicated

I think realistically it’s because they’re raising fees, so this way market makers rebates don’t go up per share (rebates are a proportion of fees). My frustration is that it’s not being clearly communicated

VeryLucky888 2026-07-10 14:02:27

Yeah hedging by crossing the spread is now more costly

Yeah hedging by crossing the spread is now more costly

zoltar02 2026-07-10 14:05:05

I thought other prediction markets would catch up with polymarket through lowering fees and not the other way, I didn't see this fees increase coming.

I thought other prediction markets would catch up with polymarket through lowering fees and not the other way, I didn't see this fees increase coming.

Sterling 2026-07-10 14:07:39

They're factoring in town prove increases which aren't realistic

They're factoring in town prove increases which aren't realistic

VeryLucky888 2026-07-10 14:08:05

The fee increase is a response to shrinking tick sizes. The argument is that takers now get tighter pricing so they’ll make back their fees by being able to buy for cheaper

The fee increase is a response to shrinking tick sizes. The argument is that takers now get tighter pricing so they’ll make back their fees by being able to buy for cheaper

Sterling 2026-07-10 14:08:32

Did they really imply that

Did they really imply that

VeryLucky888 2026-07-10 14:08:39

Makers are arguably the biggest losers here, because the decreased tick sizes gives them less edge and they’re compensated nowhere else

Makers are arguably the biggest losers here, because the decreased tick sizes gives them less edge and they’re compensated nowhere else

VeryLucky888 2026-07-10 14:09:19

It wasn’t stated explicitly but it was launched in the same announcement. I think it’s fairly clear this is the logic behind the decision

It wasn’t stated explicitly but it was launched in the same announcement. I think it’s fairly clear this is the logic behind the decision

Sterling 2026-07-10 14:10:58

less is an understatement

less is an understatement

Beast 2026-07-10 14:12:34

crazy stuff

crazy stuff

Sterling 2026-07-10 14:12:35

maker strats are basically hanging even more loosely on a thread if not dead

maker strats are basically hanging even more loosely on a thread if not dead

Beast 2026-07-10 14:13:01

just remove it entirely for godsake

just remove it entirely for godsake

Sterling 2026-07-10 14:13:07

update my ass should be called a downdate

update my ass should be called a downdate

Beast 2026-07-10 14:13:19

greedy mfs

greedy mfs

edos 2026-07-10 14:33:38

Who is the retard that decided to raise the already predatory fees on sports? And also cut the maker rebate? Without any announcement also. No comment

Who is the retard that decided to raise the already predatory fees on sports? And also cut the maker rebate? Without any announcement also. No comment

edos 2026-07-10 14:35:30

Hope that you will spend those money on customers support as is 3 days that I’m waiting a reply on an issue I had

Hope that you will spend those money on customers support as is 3 days that I’m waiting a reply on an issue I had

edos 2026-07-10 14:51:40

Is also rude on customers, and shows that who decided doesn’t understand numbers. At the moment will be better to use any other sport betting over polymarket

Is also rude on customers, and shows that who decided doesn’t understand numbers. At the moment will be better to use any other sport betting over polymarket

edos 2026-07-10 14:52:18

Just double check the fees before you do. They decided to make it unprofitable for everyone

Just double check the fees before you do. They decided to make it unprofitable for everyone

Laccs 2026-07-10 14:55:56

Will the next fee raise be silent or broadly announced?

Will the next fee raise be silent or broadly announced?

HIT9 2026-07-10 14:57:52

you guys raising fee again on a platform that is not even able to be fast, secure and a day without a bug on the UX

you guys raising fee again on a platform that is not even able to be fast, secure and a day without a bug on the UX

zoltar02 2026-07-10 14:59:35

they're trying to kill their own platform idek

they're trying to kill their own platform idek

edos 2026-07-10 15:02:00

Polymarket decision maker, use your mind for a second, at the level you put sports fees now there is absolute 0 sense in using polymarket. As every bookmaker on planet earth is able to offer better prices. Has been a poor move, revert it and market it as a funny joke

Polymarket decision maker, use your mind for a second, at the level you put sports fees now there is absolute 0 sense in using polymarket. As every bookmaker on planet earth is able to offer better prices. Has been a poor move, revert it and market it as a funny joke

frosen 2026-07-10 15:06:57

Prediction market volume is at a 10 month low

Prediction market volume is at a 10 month low

Strider 2026-07-10 15:11:33

It is SICKENING

It is SICKENING

Strider 2026-07-10 15:12:20

The funny thing is that this is not the first time

The funny thing is that this is not the first time

Samwise Gamgee 2026-07-10 15:13:30

as fees go up volume will go down which will result in less fees than before. gg

as fees go up volume will go down which will result in less fees than before. gg

Samwise Gamgee 2026-07-10 15:14:15

can't even place pregame bets anymore because barely any fill due to 300k $ on both sides. nice to have liquidity but you cant use it because of crazy fees

can't even place pregame bets anymore because barely any fill due to 300k $ on both sides. nice to have liquidity but you cant use it because of crazy fees

Z 2026-07-10 15:14:19

# more fees

# more fees

Strider 2026-07-10 15:14:38

You are sadly mistaken if you think polymarket is untouchable

You are sadly mistaken if you think polymarket is untouchable

q 2026-07-10 15:14:55

No fees or minimums on my capital one checking account

No fees or minimums on my capital one checking account

q 2026-07-10 15:15:05

NO

NO

Strider 2026-07-10 15:15:06

Just watch the august volume

Just watch the august volume

FinGeek (FoG) 2026-07-10 15:15:07

They will fix bugs and hire devs

They will fix bugs and hire devs

q 2026-07-10 15:15:11

I’m a taker

I’m a taker

Failed_state 2026-07-10 15:15:23

the more fees you pay the bigger the airdrop <:Bidenwtf:1040247645542830131>

the more fees you pay the bigger the airdrop <:Bidenwtf:1040247645542830131>

Samwise Gamgee 2026-07-10 15:16:01

whoever thought turning the awesome cheap prediction market into some rakeback casino needs to be fired asap. thats some lannister work .

whoever thought turning the awesome cheap prediction market into some rakeback casino needs to be fired asap. thats some lannister work .

nagendraravisai 2026-07-10 15:20:26

can someone lead me to the discussion happening on the updated polymarket fee

can someone lead me to the discussion happening on the updated polymarket fee

Hundt 2026-07-10 15:22:50

Its a evil anchor they placed with this current crazy fee structure... If we see poly as a tradingplattform. Something they marketing themselves as, than it shouldnt be higher than max 0.3 - 1%

Its a evil anchor they placed with this current crazy fee structure... If we see poly as a tradingplattform. Something they marketing themselves as, than it shouldnt be higher than max 0.3 - 1%

Corp 2026-07-10 15:23:20

i support the fees right now though 😄

i support the fees right now though 😄

Corp 2026-07-10 15:23:26

im running a maker strat

im running a maker strat

blunkoed 2026-07-10 15:23:29

They have no idea how an exchange works. Can’t convince me otherwise

They have no idea how an exchange works. Can’t convince me otherwise

Strider 2026-07-10 15:24:07

Tighter spreads so they can ask more fees?

Tighter spreads so they can ask more fees?

Hundt 2026-07-10 15:24:28

Short term gain for the long term pain.

Short term gain for the long term pain.

Strider 2026-07-10 15:25:18

At this point I am even wondering whether poly will benefit from the midterms volume

At this point I am even wondering whether poly will benefit from the midterms volume

RPG 2026-07-10 15:25:44

bruv 20 B company

bruv 20 B company

RPG 2026-07-10 15:25:51

they have the cash

they have the cash

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:26:35

yup legit i hopped on poly just before the taker fees got added and it was the only reason to develop strategies, since most of them have just 2% edge or so

yup legit i hopped on poly just before the taker fees got added and it was the only reason to develop strategies, since most of them have just 2% edge or so

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:26:56

now no incentive to use poly since u pay ur edge to poly like a casino vig

now no incentive to use poly since u pay ur edge to poly like a casino vig

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:27:17

at 0.03 it was tolerable im sure at 0.05 its just too much

at 0.03 it was tolerable im sure at 0.05 its just too much

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:27:47

gonna turn into a graveyard with 20 quant companies battling over 5 gambling degens

gonna turn into a graveyard with 20 quant companies battling over 5 gambling degens

Banh Mi Chuoi 2026-07-10 15:32:50

Pay fees if you are using adblocker

Pay fees if you are using adblocker

Sterling 2026-07-10 15:34:03

almost as though whoever's behind these changes take inspiration from reading our feedback and then inversely applying them in principle

almost as though whoever's behind these changes take inspiration from reading our feedback and then inversely applying them in principle

Sterling 2026-07-10 15:34:10

fucking lol

fucking lol

Z 2026-07-10 15:34:46

Company with infinite cash

Company with infinite cash

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:39:14

yh best taker strat is to go breakeven lol

yh best taker strat is to go breakeven lol

Corp 2026-07-10 15:39:17

i legit dont think its possible to create taker strats

i legit dont think its possible to create taker strats

Hundt 2026-07-10 15:40:17

yeah. Beeing a 140iq quant with 10+ years of wallstreet education and 5x Claude max subscriptions in parallel making you go breakeven as a taker on poly now. What are we even waiting for?

yeah. Beeing a 140iq quant with 10+ years of wallstreet education and 5x Claude max subscriptions in parallel making you go breakeven as a taker on poly now. What are we even waiting for?

richlb 2026-07-10 15:42:27

These takers look like they’re just giving money to Polymarket.

These takers look like they’re just giving money to Polymarket.

Sterling 2026-07-10 15:42:44

These takers look like they’re just giving money to ~~Polymarket~~ rich.

These takers look like they’re just giving money to ~~Polymarket~~ rich.

richlb 2026-07-10 15:43:01

My taker's PnL is at least 2:1 relative to fees.

My taker's PnL is at least 2:1 relative to fees.

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:43:30

It'd good for market maker not for taker

It'd good for market maker not for taker

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:44:39

add bigger fees > kill takers > no takers > less money/volume for makers > no incentive for anyone to trade

add bigger fees > kill takers > no takers > less money/volume for makers > no incentive for anyone to trade

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 15:44:49

whole ecosystem collapses for greed

whole ecosystem collapses for greed

zoltar02 2026-07-10 15:45:15

nah they fr raping both sides here

nah they fr raping both sides here

edos 2026-07-10 15:46:38

no, is worse also for maker! from 25% rebate to 15% rebate

no, is worse also for maker! from 25% rebate to 15% rebate

edos 2026-07-10 15:47:08

they really think we are that desperate to continue to use this platfrom also with increasing predatory fees

they really think we are that desperate to continue to use this platfrom also with increasing predatory fees

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:48:10

Yeah market maker will make this 300k liquidity in both sides, even if there is fees and no maker rebates, you just give to them more money, many of them are just like soft booking who hedges or professional who already work with fees

Yeah market maker will make this 300k liquidity in both sides, even if there is fees and no maker rebates, you just give to them more money, many of them are just like soft booking who hedges or professional who already work with fees

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:48:23

How it's bad for market makers dude

How it's bad for market makers dude

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:48:53

They will come even if no incentive

They will come even if no incentive

hex5442 2026-07-10 15:49:20

yes they will w larger spreads lol...

yes they will w larger spreads lol...

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:49:50

Are u good enough in mathematics

Are u good enough in mathematics

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:51:57

Encouraging market makers to come to exotic markets where there is very little liquidity is normal, but doing so in markets where people will flock doesn't make much sense.

Encouraging market makers to come to exotic markets where there is very little liquidity is normal, but doing so in markets where people will flock doesn't make much sense.

Chance 2026-07-10 15:52:07

0.03 x 0.25 = 0.0075 0.05 x 0.15 = 0.0075

0.03 x 0.25 = 0.0075 0.05 x 0.15 = 0.0075

zoltar02 2026-07-10 15:52:20

you ask how its bad and then you answer your own question in next message lmao

you ask how its bad and then you answer your own question in next message lmao

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:52:52

For me, the only explanation is that someone or a few people decide this, have personal interests involving deals with the very big whales, and receive a portion of the profits under the table.

For me, the only explanation is that someone or a few people decide this, have personal interests involving deals with the very big whales, and receive a portion of the profits under the table.

mczippo 2026-07-10 15:53:23

They will destory the platform

They will destory the platform

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:53:26

No u don't understand

No u don't understand

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:55:03

the solution is not binary

the solution is not binary

edos 2026-07-10 15:55:03

I think you are really stupid. Is worse for everyone and is not difficult to understand. Put your face in ice water for 5 min and come back

I think you are really stupid. Is worse for everyone and is not difficult to understand. Put your face in ice water for 5 min and come back

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:55:38

drop your usernames

drop your usernames

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:55:42

so we can understand who u are

so we can understand who u are

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 15:55:46

and which interest u are defending

and which interest u are defending

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 16:01:15

i had some profitable strategies in sports

i had some profitable strategies in sports

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 16:01:24

but with these taker fees both my crypto taker + sports taker dead

but with these taker fees both my crypto taker + sports taker dead

哲宇 2026-07-10 16:10:15

The transaction fee went up to 0.05. That's way too high, I can't stand it

The transaction fee went up to 0.05. That's way too high, I can't stand it

Samwise Gamgee 2026-07-10 16:11:34

yes its very bad, can't market buy anymore most of the time so no orders get filled

yes its very bad, can't market buy anymore most of the time so no orders get filled

mr.benzene 2026-07-10 16:12:02

lets switch to predict dot fun

lets switch to predict dot fun

mr.benzene 2026-07-10 16:12:52

cz will do airdrop + crime pump too

cz will do airdrop + crime pump too

Samwise Gamgee 2026-07-10 16:14:17

the fees are very very bad. less fees more volume more profit for poly.. now watch how volume drops like a rock. sure, blame the world cup ending 🤡 !

the fees are very very bad. less fees more volume more profit for poly.. now watch how volume drops like a rock. sure, blame the world cup ending 🤡 !

Staron 2026-07-10 16:14:46

With the latest fee raise, now every sportsbook has better odds/fees than you now, even the worst ones. Do better.

With the latest fee raise, now every sportsbook has better odds/fees than you now, even the worst ones. Do better.

marv0lo 2026-07-10 16:20:35

haha sport fees 0.05 😂 gg polymarket. what a joke

haha sport fees 0.05 😂 gg polymarket. what a joke

Pirate 2026-07-10 16:21:05

Agreed, what a joke platform

Agreed, what a joke platform

devisse. 2026-07-10 16:29:05

Fee increase.. people are upset.. give us $poly and fee reduction with $poly

Fee increase.. people are upset.. give us $poly and fee reduction with $poly

nagendraravisai 2026-07-10 16:30:23

0.03 x 0.25 = 0.0075 0.05 x 0.15 = 0.0075 many people sending this here can someone explain this to me

0.03 x 0.25 = 0.0075 0.05 x 0.15 = 0.0075 many people sending this here can someone explain this to me

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 16:31:15

big fees. now we are the house.

big fees. now we are the house.

marv0lo 2026-07-10 16:31:17

bro.. u naive. taker rebate program is also a joke cause u need crazy amount to get to even 18%..

bro.. u naive. taker rebate program is also a joke cause u need crazy amount to get to even 18%..

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 16:31:21

at least cashouts stayed if site is up

at least cashouts stayed if site is up

Pirate 2026-07-10 16:32:21

Just let them find out the hard way when orders stop getting filled

Just let them find out the hard way when orders stop getting filled

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 16:34:21

This is not fair, because many recreational gambler, will never see the difference of rake , they will keep gamble on the same teams, without wondering anything

This is not fair, because many recreational gambler, will never see the difference of rake , they will keep gamble on the same teams, without wondering anything

neidoux 🕎 2026-07-10 16:34:33

Only a small announcement on discord, that's all

Only a small announcement on discord, that's all

哲宇 2026-07-10 16:35:05

Due to the fee increase, I will no longer use Polymarket.

Due to the fee increase, I will no longer use Polymarket.

nagendraravisai 2026-07-10 16:37:14

why people are not talking much about increasing in fee?

why people are not talking much about increasing in fee?

Easymoneye#6666 2026-07-10 16:38:56

Polymarket is so good at shorting themselves

Polymarket is so good at shorting themselves

Pirate 2026-07-10 16:40:49

Same, they think they can begin enshitification without having a decent product to begin with

Same, they think they can begin enshitification without having a decent product to begin with

WarewaPain 2026-07-10 16:50:43

Let it be 0.03 or 0.035. but 0.05 is too fucking much

Let it be 0.03 or 0.035. but 0.05 is too fucking much

edos 2026-07-10 16:56:28

only one not in vacation was the guy that decided to raise fees <:DeadPepe:1280173104466755676>

only one not in vacation was the guy that decided to raise fees <:DeadPepe:1280173104466755676>

edos 2026-07-10 16:59:29

absolute joke, we might be in front of opensea2.0

absolute joke, we might be in front of opensea2.0

edos 2026-07-10 17:00:28

sport volume will die. simply better prices available everywhere else

sport volume will die. simply better prices available everywhere else

Deliles 2026-07-10 17:06:31

Any decent alternative platforms for sports? These fee increases kill my strategy. Kalshi not available in my region 😢

Any decent alternative platforms for sports? These fee increases kill my strategy. Kalshi not available in my region 😢

WarewaPain 2026-07-10 17:09:12

If they not gonna change to tier rate to 0.03 or 0.035 yeah there is going to be a huge backlash. I hope for the first time they listen but probably they gonna keep it like this.

If they not gonna change to tier rate to 0.03 or 0.035 yeah there is going to be a huge backlash. I hope for the first time they listen but probably they gonna keep it like this.

Stop Profit Take Loss 2026-07-10 17:21:23

best perps link https://polymarket.com/perps?c=01aq1nw3

best perps link https://polymarket.com/perps?c=01aq1nw3

Chapo 2026-07-10 17:21:26

maybe you should give people more than 3 hours of time before making significant changes to the sites fees 🙂

maybe you should give people more than 3 hours of time before making significant changes to the sites fees 🙂

Vector 2026-07-10 17:49:32

Are they actually upping the taker fees on sports?

Are they actually upping the taker fees on sports?

jeffery epstein | pussi 2026-07-10 17:53:02

tf 0.58$ fee on elon market to execute 25$ order crazyyyyy'

tf 0.58$ fee on elon market to execute 25$ order crazyyyyy'

q 2026-07-10 17:55:13

the way it’s phrased as fees. Is horrendous

the way it’s phrased as fees. Is horrendous

q 2026-07-10 17:56:19

They could solve the issue by raising the fees slightly more (coefficient goes a tick upwards) and rebating markets after they resolve if you predicted the right way

They could solve the issue by raising the fees slightly more (coefficient goes a tick upwards) and rebating markets after they resolve if you predicted the right way

Gena 2026-07-10 17:59:25

Why you people complain, youll just reach 0 faster and then youll have more free time to enjoy life

Why you people complain, youll just reach 0 faster and then youll have more free time to enjoy life

oluwasolana 2026-07-10 18:00:57

Once hyperliquid introduces more sports markets and the liquidity get better, i am out of polymarket for life, and there was never going to be an airdrop, from the amount of money they raised and the type of investors they raised money from of course an ipo is always going to be #1 option, promising an airdrop was the only way for them to get crypto natives to use polymarket after losing all that volume to kalshi. Man seriously, i pray polymarket volume falls off a cliff after 0.25c tick size and the stupid fee updates,

Once hyperliquid introduces more sports markets and the liquidity get better, i am out of polymarket for life, and there was never going to be an airdrop, from the amount of money they raised and the type of investors they raised money from of course an ipo is always going to be #1 option, promising an airdrop was the only way for them to get crypto natives to use polymarket after losing all that volume to kalshi. Man seriously, i pray polymarket volume falls off a cliff after 0.25c tick size and the stupid fee updates,

Chonpa 2026-07-10 18:04:34

So what is the best website for sport bettors who are takers?

So what is the best website for sport bettors who are takers?

mr.benzene 2026-07-10 18:06:50

Big W For Polymarket <a:2966pepeswing:1064500452529549372>

Big W For Polymarket <a:2966pepeswing:1064500452529549372>

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 18:09:22

https://x.com/exec_sum/status/2075285950763258159

https://x.com/exec_sum/status/2075285950763258159

ELOSANTA 2026-07-10 18:09:40

was this the reason for the 0.25 ticks

was this the reason for the 0.25 ticks

FewDollarsMore 2026-07-10 18:13:52

Should i keep complaining or no🤣

Should i keep complaining or no🤣

El gato 2026-07-10 18:14:50

Polymarket was already horrible and they still find ways to always make it worse...

Polymarket was already horrible and they still find ways to always make it worse...

cylex 2026-07-10 18:15:01

when the prediction markets realize that their advantage over sportsbooks isnt offering lower fees and better priced odds, but just offering more markets on more things, so they increase fees to match sportsbook prices <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>

when the prediction markets realize that their advantage over sportsbooks isnt offering lower fees and better priced odds, but just offering more markets on more things, so they increase fees to match sportsbook prices <:Bidensmile:1040247925420339251>

El gato 2026-07-10 18:16:04

It was tolerable for the site to suck while it was free but now that we pay 3% fees per transaction, we should at least have a site that actually works

It was tolerable for the site to suck while it was free but now that we pay 3% fees per transaction, we should at least have a site that actually works

El gato 2026-07-10 18:16:18

Making customers pay 3% for a site that doesn't work is ridiculous

Making customers pay 3% for a site that doesn't work is ridiculous

FewDollarsMore 2026-07-10 18:17:25

For world cups game i think .25 tick size is ok

For world cups game i think .25 tick size is ok

Sterling 2026-07-10 18:17:41

until it sets a precedent and expands to other markets

until it sets a precedent and expands to other markets

FewDollarsMore 2026-07-10 18:17:44

For low liquidity game it is not

For low liquidity game it is not

avo 2026-07-10 18:38:55

So with new fees combos are actually -infinite EV ?

So with new fees combos are actually -infinite EV ?

El gato 2026-07-10 18:45:57

There are two simple ways to make the company more profitable: - Improving the site so that the volume increases - Reducing all the useless spending Instead you chose the short-term solution of increasing the fees as much as possible... It's a bad solution, it won't work well in the long run. People will just bet elsewhere, there are hundreds of competitors. Poly has now some of the worst odds and on top of that the site doesn't work. Why would anyone use poly? Your share of the total prediction market volume is decreasing every month. Your company will die soon

There are two simple ways to make the company more profitable: - Improving the site so that the volume increases - Reducing all the useless spending Instead you chose the short-term solution of increasing the fees as much as possible... It's a bad solution, it won't work well in the long run. People will just bet elsewhere, there are hundreds of competitors. Poly has now some of the worst odds and on top of that the site doesn't work. Why would anyone use poly? Your share of the total prediction market volume is decreasing every month. Your company will die soon

PUMPA 2026-07-10 19:24:26

they only know hpw tp increase fees

they only know hpw tp increase fees

undertaker8993 2026-07-10 19:51:19

from once boasting of no fees while platform had less issues. to premium feees after making site so bad

from once boasting of no fees while platform had less issues. to premium feees after making site so bad

undertaker8993 2026-07-10 19:52:34

team needs money to buy bread. but poly team eats bread made of gold. hence need high fees

team needs money to buy bread. but poly team eats bread made of gold. hence need high fees

Throtto (🐻) 2026-07-10 19:54:19

notice how they didn't announce $poly with the fee increase to reduce backlash? Probably just not happening at this point

notice how they didn't announce $poly with the fee increase to reduce backlash? Probably just not happening at this point

Chômeur 2026-07-10 19:54:58

they probably don't know what to do about $poly for the moment

they probably don't know what to do about $poly for the moment

Chômeur 2026-07-10 19:55:26

first thing will be to announce a farming season

first thing will be to announce a farming season

Chômeur 2026-07-10 19:55:38

so TGE not before 2027

so TGE not before 2027

mr.benzene 2026-07-10 19:56:17

POLY airdrop is same as PUMP airdrop

POLY airdrop is same as PUMP airdrop

The Dude 2026-07-10 19:56:52

Like they expect makers to quote tighter with the same rebates, and takers to take more with fees more than offsetting the potential benefit of new ticks 🤡

Like they expect makers to quote tighter with the same rebates, and takers to take more with fees more than offsetting the potential benefit of new ticks 🤡

ChickenWing 2026-07-10 19:58:20

Instead of leveraging the WC hype forward, they just had to break it..

Instead of leveraging the WC hype forward, they just had to break it..